I. Barr the “anti-libertarian”
When Bob Barr announced his candidacy for the Libertarian presidential nomination on May 12, I wondered how long it would take for the “A” word to come out. By my best reckoning, it took exactly one week.
The first mention of it I read was from it was Susan Hogarth of the Radical Caucus (and in the running for a National Committee slot at the convention), who on May 19 released an Open Letter criticizing Barr's “antilibertarian congressional record and disinclination to fully repudiate it”. Since then, many other voices have joined in to form a mighty crescendo; the libertarian portion of the web has been dominated with talk of Barr's “antilibertarian” record.
There is some substance to the charge, but far less than appears on the surface. Unfortunately, what is on the surface has been largely accepted uncritically; I fear that even Barr boosters now accept the line that Barr's entire record in Congress was one of attacking and suppressing liberty.
This article, and its companion, is a small attempt to set the record straight. Due to time constraints (the Denver convention starts tomorrow) it is written in a hurry; much of it could benefit from a few days' revision and better documentation. Rest assured, though, that I have researched the subject, and will be happy to pursue the subject at length at leisure if there is interest.
So, on to the first part: to examine the evidence for Barr's “anti-libertarianism” and seek clarity on what the radicals in the Libertarian Party like Ms Hogarth are now asking him to “repudiate”. In order, with the most serious charge first:
Barr was a drug warrior
That is the most substantive charge, and the one that definitely distinguishes Barr from, for example, Ron Paul. Now, we are told, Barr has changed his mind. But on what? Not on drugs, for sure; he has not suddenly become an advocate of drug use. What he has changed his mind on, since 9/11, is the federal war on drugs. He now sees greater danger in giving the federal government the power to fight the drug war, than he does in ending the war.
That is not my position by any means — I see little danger from ending the drug war — but I can live with it. I recognize that a great many Americans have a phobia about drugs, and that traditional libertarian arguments have done nothing to sway them. Barr's advantage is that he can speak those voters' language; he may be able to recruit voters that would otherwise pay no attention, and enroll them in ending the federal Drug War. In that regard, his past record is a plus.
Barr voted for the PATRIOT Act
Many radical libertarians will tell you that Barr voted for the USA PATRIOT Act. What they will not tell you is that Barr initially opposed that Act, and took the lead in building the coalition that fought it. So why did he vote in favor? As part of a deal, in which he received two things: first, assurances that the Act would be used only in terrorism cases; and second, amendments under which the most onerous provisions of the Act would expire in four years unless re-authorized.
Sure, the assurances turned out to be bogus, and the Act has been re-authorized for another five years. But what would have been the better alternative? To have voted no, and had the Act pass with no such assurances, and no sunset? That may have made him feel good inside, but what else would it have accomplished?
Barr voted to use force in Iraq
The Iraq war was sold by lies: Lies not just about what Saddam Hussein planned to do, but about what George Bush was up to. The Iraq war was sold as a military operation to take out Hussein, declare “Mission Accomplished,” and go home. Occupying Iraq, much less the neocon nation building going on there right now, were things Congress never authorized. Nor did Barr vote for either occupation or nation building; he has always opposed nation building, as does Ron Paul (and as did George Bush, on the surface, at the time).
Barr was anti-immigrant
On V-Dare.com, Marcus Epstein summarized Barr's immigration record quite nicely: “A look at his Numbers USA grades, shows only a few weak spots in supporting guest worker programs for nurses and agricultural workers. Even in this area, he cosponsored legislation to halve H-1B visas. In every other area, he took the lead in promoting sensible immigration policies. Barr co-sponsored legislation to end birthright citizenship, eliminate chain migration, and cut legal immigration to 300,000 people a year. On enforcement, Barr voted repeatedly to put troops on the border, signed a letter opposing Bush's amnesty when it was first proposed in 2001 and fought against 245(i) and other mini-amnesties.”
Except for the proposals to cut legal immigration and put troops on the border, this could all have come from Ron Paul's 2008 platform. And Paul did support putting troops on the border (to replace the Border Patrol, which he wanted to abolish) at the time as well.
Barr was a homophobic bigot
Some of the strongest opposition to Barr comes from the sizeable gay bloc in the Libertarian Party, due to his authorship of the Defense of Marriage Act. Here is how Ron Paul described that Act in a Sept. 30, 2004 speech to the House:
If I were in Congress in 1996, I would have voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, which used Congress's constitutional authority to define what official state documents other states have to recognize under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, to ensure that no state would be forced to recognize a “same sex” marriage license issued in another state. This Congress, I was an original cosponsor of the Marriage Protection Act, HR 3313, that removes challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act from federal courts' jurisdiction.
But, Ms Hogarth asks, what about the other part of the Act, which defined marriage for federal purposes as the union of a man and a woman? Well, as Paul points out in the same speech, “government did not create the institution of marriage…. Government regulation of marriage is based on state recognition of the practices and customs formulated by private individuals interacting in civil society.” Within those customs and practices, marriage has always been defined as a man/woman union. Bob Barr did not make it up, nor did the federal government impose it. What DoMA did was recognize that traditional definition, and protect it from a redefinition by any future Supreme Court (which would have been an imposed one).
Of course, Paul also opposes a Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) enshrining that definition in the constitution. Here is his take on that from the same speech: “I agree with the assessment of former Congressman Bob Barr, who authored the Defense of Marriage Act: “The very fact that the FMA was introduced said that conservatives believed it was okay to amend the Constitution to take power from the states and give it to Washington.” Yes, “Bigot” Bob Barr also opposed the FMA. But you will not hear that from the gay Barr-bashers.
Barr was against freedom of religion
The evidence for this is a May, 1999, press release titled, “Barr Demands End to Taxpayer-Funded Witchcraft on American Military Bases,” which I have not read, which Barr purportedly wrote after watching an episode of The O'Reilly Factor which I have not seen. Nor do I think that it deserves any serious investigation; the suggestion that a press release violates the First Amendment (which is how the story was treated) does not deserve to be taken seriously. The First Amendment applies to legislation; I have seen no evidence that Barr ever proposed any.
Barr was a racist
The single piece of evidence for this is that, in 1998, Barr addressed a meeting of the Council of Concerned Citizens, a group exposed (originally by the Southern Poverty Law Center) as a “neoconfederate” organisation. Really? What did he say? No quotes have been provided. One would expect some damning racist quotes to have been produced, if there were any. As for the SPLC expose of the group: I have read it, and it sounds very much like the similar SPLC expose of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. IOW, race-baiting pure and simple; something that all Ron Paul supporters are familiar with, thanks to Jamie Kirchick's efforts last January, and something I certainly hope that Libertarians (who have too often been the targets of such attacks) will refuse to condone.
Barr was a Republican
That is undeniably true: Barr ran, and served as a Republican. Does that make him an “anti-libertarian”? For some, yes. For example, George Phillies, who explained his position in 2007, telling one newspaper that “”Ron Paul is a Republican. Ron Paul is lending credence to a party that is anti-libertarian”.
Would all radical libertarians who are now using the same line against Barr also apply it consistently to Paul (the 1988 Libertarian nominee for President)? Or Roger MacBride ( the 1976 nominee)?
As importantly, would they say the same thing about any Republicans who, as a result of the Ron Paul rEVOLution, would join them today? Would they welcome those people as new libertarians, or bar the door to them? Which is more important to them: growing the Libertarian Party by welcoming new blood, or keeping that blood supply “pure” by keeping new members out?
Oh, but Barr (through his PAC) still gives money to Republicans. Yes, he does. Is there any American involved with the Ron Paul rEVOLution who has not given money to a Republican candidate this year?
In summary (and again I have to mention that this has been after a hasty, cursory examination), the evidence of Barr's “anti-libertarianism” rests on one solid charge (his Drug Warrior past), two misrepresented events (his votes for the Iraq invasion and the PATRIOT Act), one overblown affair (his press release on Wicca), one smear (his CCC speech), and a few issues (DoMA, immigration, and the GOP) on which his positions seem little different from those of Ron Paul.
Which again raises the question in the last section. The Libertarian Party stands well positioned to capitalize on the success of the Ron Paul rEVOLution this year. It is possible for them to take the vanguard of the rEVOLution, and leap into a new position of respectability this year. On the other hand, it is possible for them to keep apart, and stay small and insignificant.
To his credit, Mr. Phillies is completely consistent: He opts for purity and the tiny tent. Many of the Barr-bashers, though, want it both ways. They dream of commanding the rEVOLution and pushing it to a new level. At the same time, they want nothing to do with the rEVOLution's actual positions. Because, let us make clear, most of these positions they are criticizing are also those of Paul and the rEVOLution.
The proposition that such radical libertarians offer the rEVOLution is: Come and work for us, give us money, and vote for us. But shut up and let us do the talking. That is certainly an offer that the rEVOLution can, and will, refuse.
Susan Hogarth, “Open Letter to Bob Barr: Some Questions,” May 19, 2008.
Patriot Act, Iraq War: “Bob Barr: Why I Want to be President,” Reason TV, Apr. 29, 2008.
DoMA: Ron Paul,”Cultural Conservatives Lose if Gay Marriage is Federalized,” U.S. House of Representatives, Sept. 30, 2004.
Wicca: “The “Burning Times Award” given to U.S. Rep. Bob Barr of Georgia,” Religious Tolerance, May 20, 1999. http://www.religioustolerance.org/burn_aw2.htm
GOP: “'Dr. No' may say yes to run for White House,” San Antonio Express, Mar. 4, 2007.
Latest posts by George J. Dance (see all)
- dbzer0 on the NAP - May 15, 2017
- Non-Aggression and Entitlement - May 6, 2017
- Why are there no libertarian countries? - April 29, 2017
- Ron Paul and the “libertarian statists” - February 22, 2017
- Social Contract: The myth - January 12, 2017
- Non-Aggression and Self-Refutation - April 13, 2016
- Teaching Christianity in American history - November 30, 2013
- What Makes Libertarians Run? - November 16, 2013
- The Non-Aggression Principle - September 1, 2013
- Do Rights Exist? - May 11, 2013
- Gary Johnson and libertarian Republicans - November 4, 2012
- Obama and Romney: Different or the same? - October 31, 2012
- Gary Johnson wins first Free and Equal Elections debate. - October 27, 2012
- Third-Party Presidential Debate October 23, 2012 - October 15, 2012
- Robbing Ron Paul - August 27, 2012
- Ron Paul's Delegate Count: Doing the Math - June 20, 2012
- Bashing Gary Johnson (II): A “strange foreign policy” - May 5, 2012
- Ron Paul's Delegate Strategy (III): Winning States? - May 1, 2012
- Ron Paul's Delegate Strategy (II): The Ground War - March 31, 2012
- Ron Paul's Delegate Strategy (I) - February 20, 2012
- Gary Johnson goes Libertarian - January 8, 2012
- New book on Ron Paul 2008 campaign - September 2, 2011
- Ron Paul Ames High in Iowa - August 10, 2011
- Copyfraud - August 7, 2011
- Non-intervention - May 20, 2011
- On Principles - May 19, 2011
- Bashing Gary Johnson (I) - May 16, 2011
- The Gary Johnson Wild Card - April 20, 2011
- Will Rand Paul Run? - March 13, 2011
- The case for a Ron Paul Presidential campaign in 2012 - March 6, 2011
- rEVOLution 2.0 — prologue - March 4, 2011
- Ron Paul money bomb raises over $400,000 - February 22, 2011
- Rand Paul wants Balanced Budget Article V Convention - January 21, 2011
- Is the Tea Party Over? - January 17, 2011
- Krugman and “Eliminationist Rhetoric” - January 14, 2011
- “Pin this on the Tea Partiers” - January 11, 2011
- The Two Faces of the Tea Party - January 6, 2011
- Justin Amash elected to Congress - November 5, 2010
- Rand Paul has commanding lead in Kentucky - November 1, 2010
- Challenging Obama's assassination policy - September 7, 2010
- Ron Paul: Gary Johnson is best alternative for 2012 - June 28, 2010
- Liberty Hits Primetime (I): “Freedom Watch” - June 15, 2010
- Civil Rights and Wrongs (I): Human Rights vs. the Civil Rights Act - June 12, 2010
- James Dobson endorsesRand Paul - May 3, 2010
- The Battle of Kentucky - March 21, 2010
- The Leftabandons Obama - January 20, 2010
- Gary Johnson and Our America - January 11, 2010
- Steve Forbes endorses Rand Paul - January 8, 2010
- Paul Surges to Lead in Senate Race - January 7, 2010
- Books and Booze - August 1, 2009
- ACLU sues Transportation Security Administration over Ron Paul staffer's detention - July 19, 2009
- “Government or Anarchy?” revisited - July 1, 2009
- Talking Trash - June 24, 2009
- Childs’s argument for anarchism - June 12, 2009
- Review: Canadian Poetry from World War I - May 31, 2009
- A sonnet on the Iraq War - May 18, 2009
- The Ron Paul Terrorist Report - March 29, 2009
- George W. Bush, American poet? - January 18, 2009
- GD’s Top 100 of2008 - January 1, 2009
- Sestina: Gardeners of Eden - December 31, 2008
- The Spirit of Liberty - December 20, 2008
- Ron Paul helps launch Young Americans for Liberty - December 7, 2008
- Obama and FISA - November 30, 2008
- Obama and Iraq - November 28, 2008
- Injustice at Nolan Chart! - November 23, 2008
- Remembering Kaye Sargent - November 20, 2008
- Ron Paul’s No-Third-Party Deals - November 14, 2008
- Libertarian politics in Ontario, Canada - November 10, 2008
- Monds wins a million votes in Georgia - November 7, 2008
- Libertarian Party wins more than 1,000,000 votes — downticket - November 6, 2008
- My endorsements for President - November 4, 2008
- Barr vs. McCain (III): Socialism - November 3, 2008
- Barr vs. McCain (II): The Wasted Vote - November 3, 2008
- Third-partying the rEVOLution in Louisiana - October 31, 2008
- Barr /Nader / Baldwin debate 2008 - October 29, 2008
- Barr vs. McCain (I) - October 29, 2008
- Trouble in Boston Tea Paradise - October 24, 2008
- Third-Party Debate Fiasco: Oct. 19 debate(s) cancelled - October 18, 2008
- Third-party debate Oct. 19 - October 13, 2008
- Barr blasts Bush on Iraq, Bailout bill - October 7, 2008
- Barr campaign builds on Bailout issue - October 5, 2008
- Third-party debate in early October - September 27, 2008
- “Snubgate” redux — Paul brushes off Barr, chooses Chuck - September 26, 2008
- Nader: Third-party debate set to take place - September 23, 2008
- Bob Barr on the Bailouts - September 21, 2008
- Baldwin will free Ramos and Compean - September 15, 2008
- “Snubgate” Scandal spreads - September 12, 2008
- “Snubgate” — Barr skips Paul’s press conference - September 11, 2008
- Ron Paul is not running for President - September 7, 2008
- Paul – McCain negotiations reported - September 2, 2008
- Sarah Palin and “Troopergate” - August 30, 2008
- Bob Barr and the Gun Ban (I) - August 24, 2008
- Bob Barr and the Gun Ban (II) - August 24, 2008
- Michael Bloomberg / Ron Paul ticket qualifies for VA ballot - August 18, 2008
- Barrwatch — Zogby has Barr at 6% again - August 17, 2008
- Bob Barr denounces dog-killing drug raid - August 14, 2008
- Boston Tea Party endorses Phillies for President - August 12, 2008
- Bob Barr’s Gun Record - August 6, 2008
- Greenwald on Barr and Political Realignment - August 4, 2008
- The Party of Choice - August 2, 2008
- Rare Ron Paul footage in new Barr video - July 27, 2008
- Debating Jim Davidson (I) - July 21, 2008
- Boston Tea Party nominee smears Barr - July 13, 2008
- Libertarian kittens - July 7, 2008
- Health Care vs. Pizza - July 6, 2008
- Barr – Paul Alliance Buzz Builds - July 5, 2008
- Phillies slams Paul and Barr at state meeting - July 1, 2008
- Government or Anarchy? - June 29, 2008
- Vince Miller RIP - June 29, 2008
- Trans-Texas Corridor changes direction - June 27, 2008
- Barrwatch — Barr takes 6% in GA poll - June 22, 2008
- Chinooks of change - June 21, 2008
- Paul: Pelosi spiked Iran bill - June 17, 2008
- Nader says, “We need more politicians like Dr. Paul” - June 15, 2008
- Ron Paul ends his campaign - June 13, 2008
- Smokin’ - June 10, 2008
- Poll — What Should Ron Paul Do? - June 9, 2008
- Ron Paul on Bob Barr: “We’re allies” - June 3, 2008
- Barrwatch — Barr polls at 6% in NC - June 2, 2008
- May 25, 2008: Barr wins on sixth ballot - May 26, 2008
- Ron Paul’s former aide reveals:“We needed” Barr to vote for the PATRIOT Act - May 24, 2008
- rEVOLution or Reaction? - May 23, 2008
- Bob Barr’s Real Record (I) - May 22, 2008
- Bob Barr’s Real Record (II) - May 22, 2008
- Huckabee’s Mouth Misfires, Again - May 17, 2008
- YouTubing the Libertarian Race - May 16, 2008
- Huckabee’s Back in the Race? — Why? - May 15, 2008
- At last it can be said: Bob Barr for President. - May 13, 2008
- Ron Paul’s Delegate Wars (V) - May 11, 2008
- Paul supporters Lawson and Jones win NC primaries - May 8, 2008
- Iserbyt blows the whistle on John McCain - May 7, 2008
- Ron Paul endorses Amit Singh for Congress - May 5, 2008
- Ron Paul’s Delegate Wars (IV) - May 4, 2008
- Operation RonDemption for Idaho - May 2, 2008
- Phillies to conservatives: “Help me Beat Bob Barr!” - April 30, 2008
- Ron Paul’s Delegate Wars (III) - April 27, 2008
- Ron Paul supporter Chuck Baldwin runs for President - April 25, 2008
- Ron Paul Gets 16% in PA - April 23, 2008
- Ron Paul’s Delegate Wars (II) - April 20, 2008
- Pure Bunk - April 17, 2008
- Ron Paul’s Delegate Wars (I) - April 13, 2008
- FBI: No hard evidence linking Bin Laden to 9/11 - April 10, 2008
- The Irrepressible Mr. Imperato - April 8, 2008
- ALibertarian on George Phillies - April 5, 2008
- Ron Paul wins Lifetime Achievement Award - April 5, 2008
- Ron Paul supporter Bob Barr to declare for President - April 3, 2008
- Ron Paul and his rEVOLution - March 28, 2008
- Mike Gravel joins Libertarian Party - March 26, 2008
- Ron Paul Endorsements Keep Pouring In … - March 12, 2008
- No, Ron Paul has Not Dropped Out! - March 11, 2008
- Ron Paul Poetry - March 6, 2008
- The Republican race is not over - February 17, 2008
- By the time of Super Tuesday … - February 11, 2008
- Kirchick, Paul, and Anti-Semitism - February 7, 2008
- Jamie Has a Hissy - February 5, 2008
- THE “NEWSLETTERS” FAQ ver. 1.2 - February 4, 2008
- Paul vs. Lincoln - February 2, 2008
- The Search for the Smoking Gun - February 1, 2008
- Another article on those newsletters? Why? - January 30, 2008