Using readily accessible data from the Internal Revenue Service (NOT some biased special interest group) for the 10 years ending with 2005, it appears to me that the “rich” are getting hosed, that tax cuts increase revenue and the less fortunate benefit as well.
Considering the table above, from 1996 to 2005, taxpayers with less than $30,000 Adjusted Gross Income:
- Saw a Federal income tax decrease of 46.06% from $741.01 to $399.72 per taxpayer.
- Saw their share of Federal income taxes decrease by 64.85% from 8.11% to 2.85%.
- Saw their effective tax rate (income taxes as a percentage of their AGI) decrease 46.6% from 5.98% to 3.19%.
- While their number of filers (also) decreased 17% from 59.83% to 49.59%, roughly half
For the same time period, taxpayers with more than $30,000 Adjusted Gross Incomes (the other half): (Table 1)
- Saw a Federal income tax INCREASE of 7.17% from $12,511.07 to $13,407.85 per taxpayer.
- Saw their share of Federal income taxes INCREASE by 5.72% from 91.89%% to 97.15%
- Saw their effective tax rate decrease 16.96% from 16.60% to 13.78%
- While their number of filers INCREASED 25.48%% from 40.17%% to 50.41%, the other half
And finally those with Adjusted Gross Incomes of over $1,000,000:
- Saw a Federal income tax decrease of 11.27% from a “paltry” $874,171.03 to an “embarrassing” $775,676.02 per taxpayer.
- Saw their share of Federal income taxes INCREASE by 71.15% from 14.73% to 25.21%.
- Saw their effective tax decrease 25.52% from 30.84% to 22.97%.
- While their number of filers INCREASED 145% from 0.09% to 0.23%.
Considering the chart above, currently, (2005), half of the taxpayers (who are also under $30,000 AGI):
- paid ONLY 2.85% of the Federal income taxes.
- or about $399.72 per filer.
- at an effective tax rate of 3.19%.
While the other half of the taxpayers:
- paid 97.15% of the Federal income taxes.
- or $13,407.85 per filer (or 33.54 times more than the other half).
- at an effective tax rate of 13.78%.
It is abundantly clear that over the last 10 years, lower tax rates have resulted in greater revenues from at least half of the taxpayers with most of the additional revenue coming from the “richest” who were beneficiaries of the greatest reduction in tax rates. But wait a minute! What about the other half? They got tax cuts also, right? Why didn't they also generate greater revenues? Is it not painfully obvious? When half the citizenry pays an insignificant amount of the revenues the effect any rate decrease will be, you guessed it insignificant! Also, taking less from the movers and shakers, (the “rich”) frees capital that creates economic activity and therefore revenue and capital that the less fortunate do not possess.
I don't get paid enough to carry this argument any further but I surmise that the disparity in tax burden between the “rich” and “poor” would be even more pronounced if:
- We were to adjust the data for inflation.
- We were to consider that the less fortunate are also the greater consumers of public disbursements.
- We were to consider that the “rich” because they spend more, also pay more in Excise taxes.
- We consider that the “rich”, by being rich, certainly carry a heavier burden of estate and gift taxes.
Many argue that tax cuts don't work as proven by our perpetual deficit and our insurmountable Federal debt of $9 trillion; $30,000 per man woman and child; $120,000 per family of 4; $67,000 per taxpayer (debt clock). A stronger argument can easily be made that the problem lies more with unscrupulous power-hungry politicians elected by a majority that have no interest (financial or other) in the integrity of government but rather are more interested in having someone else pay for their interests under force of law.Tweet
Latest posts by Chuck Angier (see all)
- Just Say “NO” to Socialized Medicine - June 19, 2009
- Are we there yet? - March 23, 2009
- Two Credit Unions With $57 Billion of Assets Go Into Conservatorship - March 21, 2009
- The DC Voting Rights Act of 2009 - March 3, 2009
- Don’t Count on the FDIC (update) - March 2, 2009
- Ethanol Bailout Coming? - December 14, 2008
- Jobs: Headlines I’d Like to See - December 7, 2008
- Let’s Maybe CREATE Some Wealth - December 3, 2008
- Don’t Count on the FDIC - September 23, 2008
- President Authorizes up to $50 Billion in Guarantees for Money Market Funds - September 22, 2008
- Food for Thought - September 19, 2008
- Congress After a 5 Week Recess - September 11, 2008
- 84,000 Jobs Lost in August – the Rest of the Story - September 9, 2008
- Stop the Insanity! - August 24, 2008
- Obama and McCain – Their Voting Records May Surprise You - August 18, 2008
- $8 Billion in US Foreign Aid to Russia - August 15, 2008
- 51,000 Jobs Lost in July – a Different Perspective - August 3, 2008
- How Dare You Mr. Durbin! - May 24, 2008
- Food Shortage 2008 - May 6, 2008
- 63,000 Jobs Lost in February - March 9, 2008
- Taxes – What is Fair? - March 8, 2008
- Paul Wellstone Mental Health and Addiction Equity Act of 2007 - March 6, 2008
- The College Access and Cost Reduction Act - March 5, 2008
- The Workplace Religious Freedom Act of 2007 - February 28, 2008
- Health Care to consume 20% of GDP by 2017 - February 26, 2008
- The Futility of Ethanol - February 20, 2008
- Health Insurance: Problem or Solution? - February 18, 2008
- Why a Fair Tax Won’t Happen - February 17, 2008
- The Truth Hurts - February 17, 2008