Why has the president pandered so much to Planned Parenthood? by Kevin Roeten
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
What is happening with Obama and Planned Parenthood (PP)? Obama and the United Nations? It’s a plain fact Obama can reduce the debt easily. But he’s not budging with those items. Obama’s being very coy about his actions. Obama will not cut taxpayer funds for PP, even though 98% of their expenditures are for abortion.
Obama seems to think PP can do no bad. Lately, he decided to trample the will of New Hampshire. On 9/13, the Obama administration made a decision to force New Hampshire taxpayers to fund the Planned Parenthood abortion business, even after New Hampshire’s Executive Council voted to revoke a $1.8 million contract.
PP says the reinstated grant will not fund abortions. But it frees up money the abortion business would otherwise have to spend on advertising and promoting abortions. Obama Administration did not provide any competitive process for other non-abortion agencies to compete for the contract.
In College Campus Censorship - LifeNews.com describes how PP, and its radically pro-abortion surrogate, Sister Song, have been desperate to find ways to counter efforts to reduce Black abortion. In 2009 PP performed over 330,000 abortions. Over 2/3 of all abortions in the US are done on Black babies. A full 98% of its services are going to pregnant women who abort.
There are 18 Arabic/Islamic States that vote against the US 75% of the time. This is according to both the US State Department, and UN records. For Egypt, Jordan, Pakistan, India, and Saudi Arabia, the US sends over $9 billion/yr. In the 2010 budget year, the US portion for the UN was $7.7 billion. With the growth rate staying constant at 26%/yr, the US will pay $9.7 billion to the UN in 2011, and $11.2 billion in 2012.
Suddenly, World Government comes to mind. For such a government, there has to be a leader. One specific person has to control one country’s specific items: energy options, healthcare, population control, climate control, and many others.
A purported leader should have many advantages, such as speaking well, desire to change the future, and purported love of all races and ethnicities. One has to start small, gain trust, and eventually have enough power to run roughshod over those who disagree.
Only two topics have been touched in this column. For energy options, Obama wants to charge for any CO2 produced. He has gotten close to worldwide consensus on this idea. But he could generate over a million new American jobs looking for drilling, and refining newfound oil; as well as building, and running new American nuclear facilities.
He could eliminate the institution of "Obamacare", cut billions in the cost of government, and stop forcing America to pay for abortions. Just on the economic side, The Economic Cost of Abortion: $202 Billion in Lost Taxes... per year, demonstrates how abortions are resulting in billions in lost taxes.
Population will be in an unstoppable freefall by 2100, and anthropogenic global warming has proven to be a scientific farce. But the government keeps pumping in billions to prove how it’s being a savior to its people. And Obama’s dealings with Unions is leading America down the proverbial one-controller path.
Obama’s first two stimulus packages cost a trillion dollars. Now, America is almost $15 trillion in debt. There are 47% of Americans (highest in history) receiving one, or more, federal benefit payments, and dependent on a non-producing government. The Department of Labor reports unemployment at 9.1%. But the real unemployment rate, counting those who have since stopped looking for work, is 16.2% (August) [American Thinker/Chad Stafco].
The views expressed
in this article are those of Kevin Roeten only and
do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates.
Kevin Roeten is solely responsible for the contents
of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated
with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.