Why Obama's Love Affair with Planned Parenthood?

 

 

What is happening with Obama and Planned Parenthood (PP)? Obama and the United Nations? It’s a plain fact Obama can reduce the debt easily. But he’s not budging with those items. Obama’s being very coy about his actions. Obama will not cut taxpayer funds for PP, even though 98% of their expenditures are for abortion.

Obama seems to think PP can do no bad. Lately, he decided to trample the will of New Hampshire. On 9/13, the Obama administration made a decision to force New Hampshire taxpayers to fund the Planned Parenthood abortion business, even after New Hampshire’s Executive Council voted to revoke a $1.8 million contract.

PP says the reinstated grant will not fund abortions. But it frees up money the abortion business would otherwise have to spend on advertising and promoting abortions. Obama Administration did not provide any competitive process for other non-abortion agencies to compete for the contract.

In College Campus CensorshipLifeNews.com describes how PP, and its radically pro-abortion surrogate, Sister Song, have been desperate to find ways to counter efforts to reduce Black abortion. In 2009 PP performed over 330,000 abortions. Over 2/3 of all abortions in the US are done on Black babies. A full 98% of its services are going to pregnant women who abort.

Obama refuses to eliminate any public funding for PP and their abortions. He seems to act as though PP is extremely important to his presidency. [YouTube - Barack Obama Addresses Planned Parenthood]

Along with that, Obama refuses to cut taxpayer funds to the UN. UN Agencies Stockpile Billions While Women and LifeNews.com shows how the UN had stockpiled funds of over $12.2 billion by the end of 2009 [Time to Rein in the U.N.'s Budget | The Heritage Foundation].

There are 18 Arabic/Islamic States that vote against the US 75% of the time. This is according to both the US State Department, and UN records. For Egypt, Jordan, Pakistan, India, and Saudi Arabia, the US sends over $9 billion/yr. In the 2010 budget year, the US portion for the UN was $7.7 billion. With the growth rate staying constant at 26%/yr, the US will pay $9.7 billion to the UN in 2011, and $11.2 billion in 2012.

Suddenly, World Government comes to mind. For such a government, there has to be a leader. One specific person has to control one country’s specific items: energy options, healthcare, population control, climate control, and many others. 

A purported leader should have many advantages, such as speaking well, desire to change the future, and purported love of all races and ethnicities. One has to start small, gain trust, and eventually have enough power to run roughshod over those who disagree.

Only two topics have been touched in this column. For energy options, Obama wants to charge for any CO2 produced. He has gotten close to worldwide consensus on this idea. But he could generate over a million new American jobs looking for drilling, and refining newfound oil; as well as building, and running new American nuclear facilities.

He could eliminate the institution of “Obamacare”, cut billions in the cost of government, and stop forcing America to pay for abortions. Just on the economic side, The Economic Cost of Abortion: $202 Billion in Lost Taxes per year, demonstrates how abortions are resulting in billions in lost taxes.

Population will be in an unstoppable freefall by 2100, and anthropogenic global warming has proven to be a scientific farce. But the government keeps pumping in billions to prove how it’s being a savior to its people. And Obama’s dealings with Unions is leading America down the proverbial one-controller path.

Obama’s first two stimulus packages cost a trillion dollars. Now, America is almost $15 trillion in debt. There are 47% of Americans (highest in history) receiving one, or more, federal benefit payments, and dependent on a non-producing government. The Department of Labor reports unemployment at 9.1%. But the real unemployment rate, counting those who have since stopped looking for work, is 16.2% (August) [American Thinker/Chad Stafco].

Per the Heritage Foundation, 75 major new regulations were passed since Obama took office, costing US businesses $40 billion. It’s also known near-future Obama plans—Obama to propose $1.5 trillion in new tax revenue.

He’s attempting another bailout. When have we heard bailout before?

If Obama stays in office, World Government, here we come. And Planned Parenthood was the first step.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Kevin Roeten can be reached  at roetenks@charter.net.


Latest posts by Kevin Roeten (see all)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *