Rick Perry Mandated Gardasil for 12 year old girls. Gardasil has caused numerous deaths already, and only a fascist would take away parental rights and assume all little girls are having sex. by Natalie Schultz
(libertarian)
Thursday, September 8, 2011
Wow, just WOW! I had a gut suspicion that Rick Perry was a bad guy deep down, but he managed to prove that he is both an idiot and an agent of the Anti-Christ all in one fell swoop in tonight’s debate. I feared he was a Dominionist, but assumed he would masquerade his intentions behind the Conservative Holy Grail of Parental Rights. Boy was I wrong! Thank you Ron Paul for cutting that fascist’s candidacy off at the knees!
To sum up what I learned during the debate: Rick Perry believes twelve year old girls are nothing more than Slut’s in Waiting and it is the Government’s job to prepare them for their future extracurricular activity as the Whores of the High School Hallways. Perry’s solution: Give them a MANDATORY shot of Garadisil! Then your daughter will either DROP DEAD or be PERMANENTLY DISABLED, or she will turn out to be a Cervical Cancer-free well-trained candidate to serve as an intern in Rick Perry’s White House.
Rick Perry is against cancer? Oh yeah, well if that was the case he would abolish all farm subsidies for soy, GMO corn and processed grain products that are force-fed to livestock and put on the store shelves, school lunch menus and the Government’s Food Pyramid. FAKE FOOD, enviro-toxins and vaccines and other drugs pushed on us by Big Ag / Big Pharma / Big Brother is what causes cancer!
Dude, at the very least he could just push Birth Control Pills on little girls like the Liberals do. Heck, at least the terminal effects of The Pill don’t show up for at least a decade on average, and Breast Cancer survival rates are higher than Cervical Cancer. But come on, give a truly DEADLY shot to someone to prevent a disease (Cervical Cancer) that affects less than 1% of the population? The Pill supposedly protects against Cervical Cancer, prevents any unwanted teen pregnancies that the Texas School System apparently is producing via its Whore in Training curriculum, and the long-term effect is less chance of those little slut’s having kids later in life because all the toxic hormones cause long-term infertility.
As for being an idiot, as soon as that part of the debate went down I said "That’s it – Perry’s done!" Come ON! Even the Huckster (Mike Huckabee) never made such a mistake during a debate! The Huckster actually managed to convince way too many Homeschooling families that he was pro-Parental Rights, but luckily there were enough intelligent Conservatives out there to expose his horrible record on taxation and Big Government anti-Parental Rights legislation. So, yeah, although it may very well be true that Social Security IS a Ponzi-Scheme, I just cannot imagine that Rick Perry will be the so-called "front-runner" after this debate. I just cannot see it. Imagine the conversation at ANY Conservative dinner table tomorrow "Well dear, I still can’t stand Romney or Huntsman, so I guess we’ll just have to vote for the guy who thinks our daughter is a slut, that we don’t know how to run our own household and raise our own kids; so we might as well just roll the dice and shoot her in the arm with Gardasil and see if she drops dead. I guess we just have to vote for Perry."
OK, just had to rant on this one! Totally Twilight Zone, dude!
As for the side-effects of Gardasil, read any anti-vaccine website and the Gardasil DEATH and PERMANENT DISABILITY stories are insane! Ironically, the vast majority of victims have been from liberal-leaning households, since conservatives have been against Gardasil from day one. I just googled Gardasil Deaths and the very first link was to the CDC itself:
Aug 8, 2011 – As of June 22, 2011 there have been a total 68 VAERS reports of death among those who have received Gardasil®
Needless to say the CDC won’t really admit that Gardasil is the actual cause of all the deaths – it could just be a "coincidence" that all these girls / women dropped dead soon after receiving the shot.
Gardasil was only approved for use in 2006 – so 68 confirmed deaths (this does not include the serious disabilities suffered) in 5 years is an extraordinarily high number of deaths, especially for a vaccine that relatively few people have actually received. And the FDA / USDA claims that raw milk is deadly! More people have died from Gardasil than from toxic Chinese drywall, lead-contaminated toys, Melamine-laced formula and dog food and raw milk combined! Yeah, we sure do need even MORE government regulations to "protect" us!
Did you like this article? If you did, Thumb It! 3
thumbs so far
The views expressed
in this article are those of Natalie Schultz only and
do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates.
Natalie Schultz is solely responsible for the contents
of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated
with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
Posted By: Bill Gee
Date: September 8, 2011 10:16:17 AM
Want to see what a post Perry/Bachman world would be like. Just read The Handmaid's Tale, or see the movie. (The book is better, though)
Want to see what a post Santorum world would be like? Just read 1984. (Both the book & movie are equally good)
Want to see what a post Romney world would be like? Just read Blade Runner or Atlas Shrugged. (The movie of Blade Runner is a classic, but the book is better. I haven't seen Atlas Shrugged yet.)
Posted By: Natalie Schultz
Date: September 8, 2011 12:10:48 PM
Obama's requirement that all health insurance covers birth control FREE OF CHARGE is taken right out of Brave New World! Ignoring the fact that it won't save ANY money (why should all the rich "yacht" owners that live near me now receive their birth controls pills for free? Sorry, but the Liberal Hamptonites do NOT need the middle class Long Island natives paying for their desire to load their bodies up with toxic hormones - paying for the future cancer and fertility problems they will end up suffering from is bad enough).
The Progressive Left uses The Communist Manifesto and Brave New World as their handbooks. Promote vigorous promiscuity and limit "undesirable" population growth via mandated Birth Control. As a bonus all the Government mandated toxic foods (soy, GMO corn, processed wheat, "vegetable" oils), and Big Pharma drugs (The Pill, Gardasil, and all the numerous "heart" medications) actually make us SICK, so when people get sick they then turn to the government for "help" and then insane stuff like ObamaCare becomes law. If people weren't brainwashed into poisoning themselves there would be no need for healthcare to be so expensive, and then the Left would not be able to convince the public that it "needs" the government to protect us via regulations and mandates and all the taxes that are required to fund such crap. It is a viscious cycle that has been deliberately in the works since WW2 (started in WW1).
The Handmaid's Tale is one of my favorite books / movies (1984 as well - both book and movie; Brave New World - all films destroyed the book!).
Perry is just DANGEROUS!!! That being said, I don't think he has a chance - I didn't like him before the debate, and I HATE him now! More importantly, my mother HATES him! As a "Moderate" voter, her opinion is probably in line with the average voter, so to quote my mother last night: "If Perry gets the nomination there is NO WAY I am voting for him!" And she voted Libertarian in the NY Governor's race because Cuomo / Paladino were unacceptable!
As for Bachmann, she hasn't said anything that bothers me yet. That being said, I'm not willing to trust her until I do more research and I haven't bothered yet because she is going nowhere fast. People are trying to make her out as a Right-Wing Christian nut-job, but so far what she has said (in debates, on Meet the Press) has NOT been in the Darbyist / Dominionist Evangelical Heretical vain. She was raised Lutheran, which is fine, but what she belives today is what really matters. She does seem way too pro-Israel and for that reason pro-War, so we really need to delve much deeper on that issue with her. For now I'm sticking with Ron Paul for this reason.
OK, so, people have taken her belief in God, "Submission" to her husband WAY OUT OF CONTEXT!!! Seriously, I've been thinking about this, and the truth is for her to re-define it as "Respect" is the closest word that ACCURATELY defines what the New Testament means according to Orthodox / Traditional Catholic theology. "Respect" is not the best synonym, but it's the best one I can think of to explain it to a non-Orthodox person. It is for this reason alone that I'm not so sure she is one of those new-fangled heretical Dominionists. Also, she seems to be a very strong-willed independent person (as am I), so to interpret her "Submission" to her husband through the context of a Mormon / Evangelical cult-like "Submission / Slave" mentality seems way off.
Now to Santorum - He suffers from the same Post-Vatican II New World Order confused-conservative mentality that Sean Hannity suffers from. Good on all issues except the WAR / Social Policy stuff. Yes, Dominionism has managed to slither its evil head into too many of the "Catholic" and even (sadly) modern "Orthodox" Churches as well.
Romney and Hunstman are nothing more than classic liberal-leaning Social Darwinist Power-Mongers. No different than Obama / Pelosi.
Gingrich actually sounded the most sane during the debate. Cain is all talking points, and Ron Paul was not on his game, but I guess it doesn't really matter since he is only ever asked "gotcha" questions anyway.
Posted By: Bill Gee
Date: September 8, 2011 02:29:53 PM
My problem with Bachman is that she appears to me to be a slightly watered-down version of Palin. She's been directly associated with making assertions that God has spoken directly to her, which is in line with most evangelical beliefs, but as the leader of the Free World, one would hope that her morning strategy sessions with her top advisors would consist of a little more than a prayer meeting. She has done remarkably well in the debates, but her uncompromising beliefs and "facts be damned" approach will probably burn her in the end.
I've never liked Santorum. As a lifetime resident of the Philadelphia metro area, his "holier than the filth of Philly" attitude has always rubbed me the wrong way. It was a good day when he lost his reelection bid.
Another thing I don't understand about most of the Republican field is their unquestioning support of Isreal. If ever there was a soveriegn State that has less interest in peace with its neighbors, it's that one. Our dealings with the Jewish nation over the past 30 years has been one of coddled appeasement for a blatenly aggressive policy towards Palistine, Lebanon and Gaza. If any other nation in the world behaved like Isreal, we would have cut off diplomatic ties decades ago. Instead, we send them weapons, foreign aid, and an unconditional promise that if they get themselves into trouble over their heads, we'll come and save them. Ron Paul seems to be the only candidate who sees them for who they are, which is why I support him.
I don't think we have anything to worry about with Perry. His campaign has all of the hallmarks of a star that burns too bright to last more than a few months. My guess is that he won't win a single primary election, or if he does, his impact will be minimal. I think Huntsman will end his campaign before Thanksgiving.
Alas, that leaves us with Romney or Bachmann. Cain & Paul will retain their loyal followings, but neither candidate will be able muster up enough support to move beyond third or second place. If we see an economic collapse in the Spring, which I'm predicting, Bachmann will likely get the nomination from the angry masses. I am hopeful that an economic crisis will cause people to actually listen to Ron Paul, but in the end, I'm a realist.
