According to Bud Rickett of the Mansfield News Journal, the Tea Party should not be blamed for the current downgrade from Standard and Poor’s because the Tea Party backed Cap-and-Balance was the only debt deal compromise offered up that met the S&P’s requirements.
The Standard and Poor’s statement for why they downgraded the credit rating: “The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government’s medium-term debt dynamics.” Does that mean that Standard and Poor would have preferred the deal that the Tea Party members of congress recommended?
It is open to interpretation since nowhere in the statement does the S&P mention raising taxes as a way to maintain the credit rating. According to CSNEWS; “Blaming the Tea Party for the downgrade is like blaming the Betty Ford Clinic for alcoholism. Moreover, the only legislation that would have met the spending-restraint criteria necessary to avert a downgrade was the Cut-Cap-Balance proposal. It included $5.8 trillion in cuts, easily more than what Standard and Poor’s required. But President Obama vowed not to sign it, and the Senate Democrats — here we go again with the Kerry hypocrisy — refused to consider it.” So if Standard and Poor’s was wanting larger cuts in spending then the deal that the President and congress finally agreed too, then it would appear that Mr. Rickett got it right. The Tea Party is not to blame for the downgrade, they had the answer yet our spendthrift President and Congress in their rush to spend taxpayer money and spend us into an even deeper debt managed to downgrade the credit rating. Then in typical democrat fashion, rather than admit that their ill planned decision caused this fate they blame the Tea Party. The Tea Party that barely holds a minority of the seats somehow managed to force a downgrade by not wanting taxes raised.
Supporters of the Tea Party are fighting back, including creating a website called The Obama Downgrade, which suggests that the first ever credit down grade falls directly on his shoulders. Matt Kibbe of Freedom works suggests that Obama is at least partially to blame since he did not even present a debt proposal for Congress to consider.
While there is certainly enough blame to go around, we need to stop looking for who caused the downgrade and start working on fixing the problem, and not with secret meetings. Congress needs to get back to work, they know how to fix this, so does President Obama and it is not by spending more money.Tweet
Latest posts by Rachel Lynn Robinson (see all)
- What about a third party candidate - July 23, 2013
- Should late term abortions be banned? - July 16, 2013
- Abortion and The Girl Scouts - November 27, 2011
- Bi-National Health Insurance - October 19, 2011
- Putting the Godfather in the White House - September 26, 2011
- Is Voter Fraud Real, and What can be done to Stop It. - August 30, 2011
- Pro Choice can mean Choosing Life - August 29, 2011
- Anybody but Obama - August 28, 2011
- Why the Second Amendment Matters - August 26, 2011
- Who is to Blame? - August 20, 2011
- Rick Perry, Conservative or Democrat in Republican Clothing - August 17, 2011
- Sex Education in Preschool - August 17, 2011
- Finding the Right Voice in 2012 - August 12, 2011
- Can Herman Cain Win the Election? - August 10, 2011
- Planned Parenthood vs. Kansas - July 23, 2011
- Is It Okay to Prevent Protesting at Military Funerals? - June 2, 2011
- How E Verify is Going to Help Prevent the Employment of Illegals - June 1, 2011
- Finally a Birth Certificate - April 28, 2011
- How will the passage of S 34 affect everyday people - April 26, 2011