Reference to One World Government, and how America is better off apart from that. by Frank Brooks
(libertarian)
Thursday, August 19, 2010
It has been theorized that as mankind progresses we are eventually to become one world government. All debts will be paid into one system, and distributed accordingly to where it is needed the most. Many nations have made the first steps into globalization. The European Union is a prime example by adopting the Euro. The Euro was meant to benefit all nations within the monetary union but it has proven its flaws. The unbalance has contributed to increasing debt for some, and benefited others with a stable reward.
Former French President Jacques Chirac emphasized the ideal of one solid monetary system that could be used all over the world and not just in Europe. I reviewed some of his ideologies, and did research on what goal he had in mind. He was looking to benefit France from exploiting foreign currencies. I read an economic report that suggested if he had accomplished his goal of filtering the French economy throughout the world France would have become extremely wealthy. Most of that increase in economic growth would have been unfairly taken out of the American economy, and Jacque Chirac was all ears. He felt it was necessary for the United States to cut back from our greed, and ironically fill the French banks with money. This was only a projection of what he felt the Euro could accomplish when taken to a larger expanse. What is unfair about the idea is that France has had very steady unemployment rate that has unchanged even now. Many people live off of the government in France, and many have considered it out of laziness more than disability. It's part of their socialistic structure that holds firmly due to taxes, and tourism. I have always felt that if someone works they deserve what they earn, and it says in the Bible, "if you don't work then you don't eat". Take that to heart religiously or not it is still a very wise saying. Everybody capable of being constructive each day has a duty to make the world go round. The beauty of it is that most of us get paid for it, and have a right to more of our earnings rather than less. Let's hope it isn't lessened any further.
Just to clear up any confusion I am not capping on anybody who is in need of government assistance because we all know there are people who truly need it. What I will say is that I believe we shouldn't set a bar to where people just do nothing, and expect it to be taken care of when they can work like everybody else. There is a job for everybody who has the ability to function. The only problem is not everybody is blessed with the same talents or wisdom. Give or take those that strive to do as much as they can nobody is guaranteed what they are after. What makes it depressing is when they get to a point to where they can benefit in life for a change but when they get there poor government has ruined the standard. Then it is back to square one, and it feels like you are walking through a revolving door.
This isn't fair to any society who deserves a stable economy, and a better quality of life. Corruption shouldn't be pardoned when the people are paying to keep their government up and running. Sadly enough we have seen that here in the United States, and have history books filled with other nations that were fueled by misleading their own citizens. It has crossed my mind whether or not the world is at a point of no return. If nations around the globe can never pay their debts then what is going to happen? Will we all just intertwine, and pay into one great big bank that is controlled by global council. That would be an Ultimo Socialistic Government. It's a bit weary to think about because that is what Hitler, and Hirohito tried to achieve. The only difference is that dictatorship would have been in place, and a council would be second in power. We probably couldn't expect a World President in our lifetime but it could happen in the future. It would be a dictatorship in disguise and if you think about it that is what it would have to be. Somebody would have to be calling all the shots just like our American President does. Religious factions would consider this leader a Savior or the Anti Christ but in any revelation is would be one solitary leader with a representative from each nation organized as a council.
If this form of government were to take effect it would halve the social structure. In most modern nations they consider social classes to be at seven to eight levels. One would be your highest elite level, and the lowest being the poor or homeless. If the economy of a world government were in place you would have roughly three to four levels. The super wealthy on top then the rich. Then you would have the working class barely holding things together, and finally the poor. What would be hard on most people is that a chance of advancing in the world would be extremely more difficult to achieve. I wouldn't want to break from being a free American with a dream in mind for that any day of the week. If we continue to push for a world democracy you are more apt to considering a world order you will not be able to change. The United States is already a well established union, and we have perfected a democracy like no other. I do not want to see it change into a submissive government that takes other rules into play. I am content living the American way, and not any other. What the rest of the world decides is their business, and I am okay with letting them do their thing.
Did you like this article? If you did, Thumb It! 0
thumbs so far
The views expressed
in this article are those of Frank Brooks only and
do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates.
Frank Brooks is solely responsible for the contents
of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated
with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
