In the wake of the 9/11 attacks on the United States, the federal government began a series of ever-increasing security changes in the screening of airline passengers to prevent future terrorist attacks. These changes all view passengers (more than 99.9% of whom are law-abiding airline customers) as potential 'problems;' thus, in an effort to increase 'safety,' passengers are searched and substances ranging from nail files to shampoo bottles are prohibited.
Of course, none of that prevented Richard Reid, the “shoe bomber,” from attempting to blow up American Airlines Flight 63 on Dec 22, 2001 using plastic explosives hidden in a hollowed out shoe.
True to form, the government's response was to require passengers to remove their shoes and put them through the x-ray machines. Subsequent changes prohibited liquids on board.
And so, on Christmas Day 2010, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab boarded Northwest Flight 253with powdered explosives in his underwear. No liquids, no hollow shoes.
The response? The feds now believe that full-body x-rays machines, that will enable them to look into underwear, will fix this 'loophole.' Of course, the machine is unable to look through skin into body cavities….anyone want to guess how the next terrorist will hide their explosives? (Remember, these are *suicide* bombers).
It is instructive to note the similarities between the incidents surrounding Richard “Shoebomber” Reid, Umar “Christmas Bomber” Abdulmutallab, and even United Airlines Flight 93 on the day of the 9/11 attacks:
Government Security measures were unable to prevent the attacks. 100% safety will never be possible – not in the real world. Each time a new security measure is used, would-be terrorists will simply use a different ploy. Obama's 'tightening' of security on flights originating in a list of 14 nations is doomed to failure, as terrorists simply set up bases, obtain passports, and choose to depart from nations not on that list.
But there is a more important similarity between these events:
Flight 93 missed its Washington target because passengers took action and subdued the terrorists.
Richard Reid's plot failed because passengers subdued him and bound him with seatbelt extensions and headphone cords, and a doctor on the flight plied him with valium.
Umar Abdulmutallab failed because a passenger subdued him.
And in the midst of this, while pilots are asking to be armed, the Obama administration is defunding and downplaying the need and right of airline personnel and passengers to defend themselves. Passengers, Pilots, and Airline staff are not the problem: they are the solution.
In a related hair-brained, half-thought-through action, The Joint Facilities committee of the New Hampshire House just passed by an 8-3 vote (party lines) the following regulation:
“No person, except for law enforcement personnel in active duty, shall carry a firearm or other dangerous or deadly weapon or an explosive, openly or concealed, while inside the State House, the Legislative Office Building, the Upham Walker House, or any of the underground tunnels connected to these buildings. Law enforcement personnel, when requested by State House security staff, must produce sufficient identification establishing their status as law enforcement personnel.”
In other words, every would-be terrorist or nut job is now on notice that the 400+ legislators at the State House, as well the staff, is now defenseless. Once again, this turns reality on its head: an armed citizenry is the answer, not the problem! It is a rule that the full legislature should overturn immediately.Tweet
Latest posts by Tully (see all)
- Tucson shootings: the aftermath, civility, and freedom - January 12, 2011
- Judge: American GIs should “convert” Lesbians - November 27, 2010
- 3 Lessons from the TSA Horror Stories - November 23, 2010
- Debt-Reduction Commission, Part 2: Social Security - November 15, 2010
- Obama's Debt-Reduction Commission: Income Tax & the Mortgage Interest Deduction - November 13, 2010
- Tackle Gerrymandering and Election Reform, not Term Limits - September 4, 2010
- Roger Clemens: Next target of the Anti-Steroid Crusaders - August 21, 2010
- BP and the Minerals Management Service: the Legacy of Capture Theory - June 2, 2010
- Goldman Sachs: A Fraudulent history repeats itself –The Legacy of Ashanti Gold - April 20, 2010
- Fiscal Conservatives: Ending DOMA is a responsible step - February 24, 2010
- Obama and the Generals on DADT: pathetic cowards. - February 2, 2010
- Government Arrogance… - January 18, 2010
- Thoughts on Airline Security - January 6, 2010
- New Hampshire’s turn for an Independent? - December 10, 2009
- Unemployment Rate: Have we turned the corner?Not even close…. - December 5, 2009
- H1N1 Vaccines, Breast Cancer, and the Congressional Health Care Bill. - November 22, 2009
- Civilian Criminal Trial for Mohammed: a Mistake - November 14, 2009
- HR 3962 (Health Care) – on Balance a dangerous bill - November 8, 2009
- GDP up 3.5%?Obama’s Hollow Cheerleading…. - October 31, 2009
- Dede Scozzafava: A Pragmatic and GOOD Choice for New Yorks 23rd CD. - October 26, 2009
- Federal Tax Code: Time for GLBT Civil Disobedience - October 13, 2009
- 5 Steps to Better Health Care - July 17, 2009
- Why the Bailout is Wrong - October 2, 2008
- The Parable of the Thermometer - July 15, 2008
- The New Yorker, The Obamas, and the Masses - July 15, 2008
- Gay Marriage: Separating the Ecclesiastical from the Civil - July 14, 2008
- Remembering Why we Rebelled - July 4, 2008
- Re-Thinking the Criminal Justice System - June 14, 2008
- The “True Colors” Tour…a mixed bag - June 14, 2008
- Electoral Strategy for Bob Barr: stay away from swing states! - June 14, 2008
- New Hampshire Libertarians passivity towards Bob Barr insures their continued irrelevency - June 14, 2008