Obama Orders 1 Million U.S. Troops to Prepare for Civil War.
Obama orders 1 million troops to prepare for civil war. by Levi S.
(centrist)
Friday, December 11, 2009
Russian Military Analysts are reporting to Prime Minister Putin that US President Barack Obama has given orders to his Northern Command's top leader, US Air Force General Gene Renuart, to begin immediately increasing his military forces to 1 million troops by January 30, 2010, in what many reports warn is an expected outbreak of "civil war" within the United States before the end of the winter season.
According to reports, in the past weeks Obama has had numerous meetings with the U.S. War Council on how to manage the expected crash of Americas banking system while at the same time keeping Americas military at the top. Russia is calling this plan a "last ditch effort" whose success is "far from certain."
And we must not forget what President Obama said in his Nobel Peace Prize speech in which he mentioned the numerous secessionist groups and their progress, he specifically mentioned the Texas Nationalist Movement and inquired that he would not let Texas secede without using force.
So we will see how this turn of events plays out. Will America break out in a second Civil War? Will citizen-soldiers of America fire upon their own fellow Americans? If we have learned anything from history, it is that for freedom the American people will fire upon themselves. Hope for a peaceful separation that is hoped for by many secessionist parties, it appears, is melting away.
The views expressed
in this article are those of Levi S. only and
do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates.
Levi S. is solely responsible for the contents
of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated
with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
One million troop increase by the end of next month?
And this is being accomplished by ordering the commander of Northern Command to "increase his troops?" How? Does he just go out on the city streets and start rounding up conscripts? It doesn't work that way, except in the movies.
This alleged report has some aspects that incite skepticism to say the least. Can you point me to any links or other sources?
I think Levi is writing fiction here. Obama has not even been able to pass his Nationalized Health Care plan with a Public Option and "free" health for all even with the people from his own party in control. So how can he mobilize 1M troops in less than two months for a civil war that shows no signs of it even starting. This sounds too extreme. Jonathan is right, this will make for a good movie script. Nothing more.
Obama is a great orator that is for sure but what is he really saying? Obama is not the Missiah! The bible warns of false phrophets.
Obama does not specifically mention Texas in his Nobel Speech but in the following passages directly copied and pasted from the transcript of his Nobel speech in my view, the message comes across clearly enough for me.
God Bless Texas!
Excerpts of Obama’s Nobel speech… he says
“Over time, as codes of law sought to control violence within groups, so did philosophers, clerics, and statesmen seek to regulate the destructive power of war. The concept of a "just war" emerged, suggesting that war is justified only when it meets certain preconditions: if it is waged as a last resort or in self-defense; if the forced used is proportional, and if, whenever possible, civilians are spared from violence.”
He goes on to say….
“In many ways, these efforts succeeded. Yes, terrible wars have been fought, and atrocities committed. But there has been no Third World War. The Cold War ended with jubilant crowds dismantling a wall. Commerce has stitched much of the world together. Billions have been lifted from poverty. The ideals of liberty, self-determination, equality and the rule of law have haltingly advanced. We are the heirs of the fortitude and foresight of generations past, and it is a legacy for which my own country is rightfully proud.”
…and later he says
“To begin with, I believe that all nations - strong and weak alike - must adhere to standards that govern the use of force. I - like any head of state - reserve the right to act unilaterally if necessary to defend my nation. Nevertheless, I am convinced that adhering to standards strengthens those who do, and isolates - and weakens - those who don't.
The world rallied around America after the 9/11 attacks, and continues to support our efforts in Afghanistan, because of the horror of those senseless attacks and the recognized principle of self-defense. Likewise, the world recognized the need to confront Saddam Hussein when he invaded Kuwait - a consensus that sent a clear message to all about the cost of aggression.
Furthermore, America cannot insist that others follow the rules of the road if we refuse to follow them ourselves. For when we don't, our action can appear arbitrary, and undercut the legitimacy of future intervention - no matter how justified.
This becomes particularly important when the purpose of military action extends beyond self defense or the defense of one nation against an aggressor. More and more, we all confront difficult questions about how to prevent the slaughter of civilians by their own government, or to stop a civil war whose violence and suffering can engulf an entire region.”
Obama isn't a great orator. Not by a long shot and the teleprompter isn't even the beginning of his lack of skill. He is uninspired and monotone. He's selling me a set of pots and pans in my living room is all he's doing. His blandness is polished, that's all.
Go to Americanrhetoric.com to listen to audio archives of America's greatest speech makers. Obama pales in comparison, and I'd be willing to bet he will never be showcased in that forum.
General MacArthur was a great orator. Martin Luther King was a great orator.
While Obama definitely directed his Nobel speech at Texas because of the "secessionist" comments, the writer draws his inferences from an article which uses Russian sources. Those have proven to be very unreliable. The break-up of the U.S. wilol not come as a result of a violent, catastrophic civil war -- it will be accomplished much like the demise of the Russian empire, indiv idual states seceding. Texas will merely be the first.
The source you give is just your typical Pravda, nothing more distinguished than a syndication of Weekly World News or The Sun. Tabloids mixed with anti-American propaganda.
Posted By: Jahfre Fire Eater
Date: 2009-12-16 14:40:19
Hi Levi,
I suppose without the Internet you and Chuck Baldwin and the rest of pro-violence crowd would have to create your own propaganda; or, rely on crazy Joe down at the IHOP or whatever, for the notions to base your fear mongering on. What with the oppressive nanny state and anti-terror-oriented civic duty to report suspicious activity ,you folks are really lucky that Google allows you to cite articles from anywhere in the world that happen to feed your fears.
Posted By: James Graybeal
Date: 2009-12-22 07:37:45
Gen Renuart, the USNORTHCOM Commander, said it best, \"There is no truth to the EU Times story of a massive troop increase under my command, US Northern Command. In fact, I was surprised myself when I first became aware about these reports just a few weeks ago. I can assure you that the notion that I have been asked or directed to stand-up any 1-million-sized force is completely without fact. I think it is interesting to note here that there are 1.4 million active duty forces total in all the U.S. Military combined today. \" Check out the entire blog at:
This story is bogus. The "source" of the story, despite its name, is actually an extremist website out of Texas with known links to extreme right wing organizations. Do a web search on the name and trace back the URL to find the real source of this story.
The communist-in-chief (not commander-in-chief, as it should be) negro is nothing more than a pawn, and he's realizing that fact daily.
Another civil war, my ass, this is world war three, which will strengthen when the murderous leeches of society, those who hold the cash and power, and only look and sound good for public acceptance: gates, greenspan, goldsteins, bush, pelosi, mccain, lieberman, wolfowicz, chertoff, rothschild, silversteins, soros, buffet, napolitano, geithner, and all, who finally understand their crazy melting-pot of the races and governance by socialism for good business sales has been rejected, figure out exactly what they want left over on earth.
Oh No! there won't be a world war two: there are now machine guns and poison gas that can be used.
Oh No! there won't be a world war three: the secrets of the power of the atom have been unlocked by mankind, and we are now so smart;,:
yahhh...rrright.
You do not understand how inhuman the leeches who hold the (unearned; contrived) cash really are.
People this is very possible, let me explain. We are currently in Pandemic Level 6 Martial Law. U.N. law supercedes U.S. law. All provisions are in place. Go to my sight on Youtube: NotForSale2NWO for more info....
While secession is moving off the history shelves and being dusted, there has been serious mention of this political right by any serious political office holder. No doubt Congress and President Obama are pushing the envelop as to the powers of government, and surely states may begin to react as more and more of their state revenues are controlled by unfunded mandates. But whether it would end up in violence is far from certain. Dr. Martin Luther King did an excellent job of teaching all American about peaceful civil disobedience, and while I believe secession is a real alternative, I dont believe it would play out through militant operations within the states. The US military is over taxed, cannot guard our borders and therefore would be hardpressed to really react to broad secession movement. At present that movement does not exist. But the further the radical Democrats push the more they help drive Americans towards secession.
Want to comment on
this article? Leave your comment
here. Your email address is required to track your
comment. However, we will neither publish your email
address nor distribute it to other organizations or
persons. The only reason we might use it would be if
we needed to contact you regarding your comment. All
comments are subject to our
terms of use policy.
