Topic: Government Accountability
Succumbing to plausible deniability! Once again, the political wall of deceit has shown a light of truth. The highly criticized special advisor to the President, Van Jones has resigned in a clueless absorption of DC corruption.by Darrell Dillard
(libertarian)
Monday, September 7, 2009
Once again, the political wall of deceit has shown a light of truth. The highly criticized special advisor to the President, Van Jones has resigned in a clueless absorption of DC corruption. Don't be fooled with the conclusion that all is done. The political-minded will succumb to the Administration's "plausible deniability".
The clueless absorption brought intrigue and criticism from all facets of society. With a clear denial of allegations about his past, and the unproven accusations against him brought unwanted publicity to the Administration. It is sure to become short in the memory of the political arena. In my inquisitive nature, I have to wonder, "Who is next?" Will the Administration allow the current situation to alter its agenda? Will they ever fully explain the need for their version of (BIG government). The American people need answers, and are increasingly tiring of the government's attitude of denial of all their actions. Thus leading back to accountability.
The politics in the Capitol, have been inundated with the ring of intrigue. It doesn't take much to turn from propaganda to that of all-out perversion of the matters at hand. This Administration needs to partake of historical fact, "Where are the President's advisors? Or lack thereof. Taxpayer dollars have been frivolously spent to found Obama's special advisors, yet there doesn't seem to be much in the proper advisory of such matters. Let's break this down into simpler terms.
Let's break this down into simpler terms. The President can appoint cabinet members with legislative confirmation. The current cabinet consists of fifteen executive-level departments, six non-department administrative heads with Cabinet level rank, and the assumption of two other department heads with Cabinet level rank. Each Administration has amending authority of such matters. Along with the (non-confirmed) special advisory appointments, the total number of advisors to at least fifty.
You might ask, "That seems to be high in number. Are you sure that you have it right?"
To my thinking, this is an enormous point of contract. This administration should be impervious to flawed individuality. In answer to the question of the number, I will summarize the current list of such non-confirmed appointments. Such appointments have been alluded to being (Czars), though I will let you judge for yourself.
Why is there such frivolous spending on such positions? As a youth, I thought the Cabinet was all the president needed. Was I way off? With such a vast support staff, why would the president be unknowing of the history of such members. The position of President allows for the vetting of any potential threat of security. The respect and authority of such a position must be protected. The question to this would be, "Was a vetting process used to post such positions, or was it based on friendship? And why?"
The current administration (or any other) has no plausible reasoning to allow for such persons being posted. Where is the outrage of the forbearance of the Socialist agenda? Why is there no accountability from President Obama? He orates the dismissal of our rights, yet he is forsaking the very oath to defend the Constitution. That by which, these rights and liberties were guaranteed. I want answers. Don't you? I am Citizen, and I am of the people. Hear my voice.
I would like to thank the great Americans, who have researched and found fact on the issues of the day. Though I do not always agree with them, I must remind you of the importance of the respect and dignity granted of the post of President of the United States of America. You don't have to respect the person, for the seat exudes it's own allure of respect and authority.
To set my opinion aside, I would like to ask you just one question. "Has your President been found to abide by his duties set forth in this oath?"
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Thank you, and good day. "REFORM, REFORM, REFORM!"
Did you like this article? If you did, Thumb It! 5 thumbs so far
The views expressed in this
article are those of Darrell Dillard only and do not represent
the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. Darrell Dillard is
solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an
employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
"To set my opinion aside, I would like to ask you just one question. 'Has your President been found to abide by his duties set forth in this oath?'"
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
I think that your question does not apply. The main problem with the current tenat in the White House is that we don't know where he was born, what's his real name, or if he actually took his oath of office according to the established procedure.
Please, read my article, "Obama: Transparency, Invisibility or Treason."
Want to comment on this
article? Leave your comment here. Your email address is
required to track your comment. However, we will neither
publish your email address nor distribute it to other
organizations or persons. The only reason we might use
it would be if we needed to contact you regarding your
comment. All comments are subject to our
terms of use policy.
