Topic: Obama
Obama's Socialist Revolution: Old Wine in Ancient Casks According to Servando, Obama's socialist revolution is an implementation, using psychological warfare techniques, of the Fabian socialists' communo-fascist New World Order.by Servando Gonzalez
(libertarian)
Thursday, August 20, 2009
In his book The New World Order, published in 1940, (you may download the full text of the book clicking here) Fabian socialist H.G. Wells explained in clear terms the Fabian's plan to implement the New World Order through psychological warfare techniques against the peoples of the world.
Wells begins his argument with a short introduction in which he argued, "the system of nationalist individualism and uncoordinated enterprise" is "the world's disease, and it is why the whole system has to go. It has to be reconditioned down to its foundations or replaced." Wells is clearly advocating for the elimination of national borders and sovereign states as political entities, because, he argues, nationalism is a disease threatening to destroy the world. He doesn't mention, however, that international bankers have been the major force behind the curtains pushing national governments to war and profiting from it.
Also, what he calls "uncoordinated enterprise" is true free market non-monopolistic capitalism, a system the international bankers despise and abhor. One must keep in mind that John D. Rockefeller's guiding principle in business was "competition is a sin." No wonder Clinton Roosevelt and later Karl Marx, both of them secret disinformation agents for their monopolistic masters, made "competition is a sin" a cardinal principle of their Communist ideology.
Just recently, some people have began suspecting that all the environmental threats which according to some will destroy us and planet earth if we don't act fast now, are nothing but disguised, baseless propaganda. Well, they are not far from the truth. As an argument to why a New World Order is necessary, Wells analyzes what he terms "disruptive forces" in society.
And now let us come to the disruptive forces that have reduced that late-nineteenth-century dream of a powerful world patchwork of more and more civilized states linked by an over-increasing financial and economic interdependence, to complete incredibility, and so forced upon every intelligent mind the need to work out a new conception of the world that ought to be. It is supremely important that the nature of these disruptive forces should be clearly understood and kept in mind. To grasp them is to hold the clues of the world's present troubles.
And, just a few paragraphs below, Wells expands his reasons why we have to act right now to save the earth -- he wrote this in 1940) -- with a series of arguments that seem to have being taken directly from Al Gore's Earth in the Balance. According to Wells, private enterprise capitalism is destroying the forests, polluting the seas, and contaminating the air to the point that, "apart from war, our planet is being wasted and disorganized."
Consequently, Wells concludes that there is a "manifest destiny for some collective world control to eliminate warfare and the less generally admitted necessity for a collective control of the economic and biological life of mankind." That was exactly the main idea behind President Wilson's failed League of Nations. The League of Nations , however was not the product of Wilson's lucubrations, but an idea implanted in his mind by his controller, Fabian socialist and CFR founder Col. Edward Mandell House.
A few pages below Wells explains how Roosevelt's New Deal was plainly an attempt to achieve a working socialism and avert a social collapse in America: it is extraordinarily similar to the successive "policies and "plans" of the Russian experiment. Americans shrink at the word "socialism," said Wells, but what else can one call it?
So, according to Wells, world socialism is unavoidable, but it has to be implemented through a revolution, or, by what he calls the "revolution conspiracy" in which a number of people set about organizing the forces of discomfort and resentment and loosening the grip of the government's forces, in order to bring about a fundamental change of the system
Wells see the aims of this new Revolution as essentially a change [emphasis mine] in directive ideas, adding, "In its completeness it is an untried method." Then he expands in what must be done to spread this conception of a new world order. To Wells, the only way to make people accept this new idea is neither by a violent revolutionary explosion nor a coup d'ètat, but through propaganda (now we call it psychological warfare), even though he prefers to use the word "education" instead.
According to Wells, the new world order "cannot be brought into existence without a gigantic and more or less coordinated effort of the saner [emphasis mine] and abler elements of the human population." And, in the following paragraph, he expands on what he calls "the problem of sanity."
To Wells, those who deny "the urgent desirability of world collectivization," are not sane. This is just a step from creating the concept of "globophobia" a mental disease, which I would bet the American Psychological Association is already working on how to cure it. Like in Stalin's times, globophobe kooks, that is, mentally deranged people who oppose socialism and globalization, should be committed to mental institutions for treatment and re-education.
As many American have suspected, and by this time may have confirmed, Obama is an uneducated, incompetent (giving his opinion about the Gates casebefore knowing all the facts disqualifies him as a lawyer), arrogant fool. I don't think he has ever read Wells, and most likely has never heard about him. So, who implanted Wells' ideas in his brain?
I don't have an answer to that question, but my educated guess is that the main suspect for this is none other than his CFR controller, Zbigniew Bzrezinski. Just a perfunctory reading of Bzrezinski's book Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, shows that he is a follower of Wells' ideas, augmented by the use of psychotronic devises in psychological warfare operations against the peoples of the world.
Now, I don't think most Americans have any doubt whatsoever that we are experiencing the incremental implementation of a socialist revolution in this country. But, what type of socialist revolution is this? Is Obama's revolution fascist or communist?
The answer is not an easy one. Both fascism and communism are extreme forms of socialism favored by the Left. Apart from some minor differences, however, the main thing distinguishing one from the other is that fascism is a political system where corporations control the state, while communism is the one where the state controls the corporations. Departing from that definition, one may think that, given the fact the Obama administration has nationalized several corporations, this is a sure index of communism.
But, like in the medieval symbol of the ouroboros, depicted as a serpent biting its tail, there is abundant evidence showing that the Obama administration is fully under the control of Wall Street bankers, oil magnates, and CEOs of transnational corporations. (See my article "Why Obama? The Plot Thickens.")
Therefore, calling communo-fascist the system the CFR conspirators are trying to implement through their puppet Obama is closer to the truth than calling it just fascist or communist. Actually, there is an old name for this new type of political system: it is called the New World Order.
Paraphrasing Orwell's argument, I would add: Americans shrink at the word "communo-fascism," but what else can one call it?
---------------------
Servando Gonzalez is a Cuban-born American writer. He received his training as a historian at the University of Havana, and has written books, essays, articles, and multimedia on Cuban and Latin American history, intelligence and espionage, semiotics and political satire.
Servando is the author of Historia hertica de la revolucin fidelista; Fidel Castro para herejes y otros invertebrados, Observando, The Secret Fidel Castro: Deconstructing the Symbol, The Nuclear Deception: Nikita Khrushchev and the Cuban Missile Crisis, and La madre de todas las conspiraciones: una novela de ideas subversivas. He is currently working on his new book: Psychological Warfare and the New World Order: The CFR-CIA-Castro Connection.
His articles have been published in many magazines, newspapers, and Web sites in the U.S. and abroad. As a multimedia developer, Servando authored many computer programs, among them: Hypertext for Beginners, Popol Vuh: An Interactive Text/Graphics Adventure, The Riddle of the Swastika: A Study in Symbolism, and How to Create Your Own Personal Intelligence Agency. His documentary film, Treason in America: The Council on Foreign Relations, the first program of the TruhLies series, appeared in mid 2008. The next program, Partners in Treason: The CFR-CIA-Castro Connection will appear this Fall.
The views expressed in this
article are those of Servando Gonzalez only and do not represent
the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. Servando Gonzalez is
solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an
employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
Hi Servano, I found your articles by following a link in it back here from a topic page at the ACL. I really liked your article at nolanchart about the CFR and will post a link to it from my blog. With your permission I would like to repost the entire article.
The name of the emerging global system is Communitarianism. And yes, the guru of the movement, Dr. Amitai Etzionii, is a former CFR member. You'll find lots of recent use of the word on the acl homepage http://nord.twu.net/acl
Thank you for such clear and direct writing. We are looking for someone to translate our book 2020: Our Common Destiny into Spanish. If this is something you may be interested in doing or know of someone who might be able to do it, please let us know.
Want to comment on this
article? Leave your comment here. Your email address is
required to track your comment. However, we will neither
publish your email address nor distribute it to other
organizations or persons. The only reason we might use
it would be if we needed to contact you regarding your
comment. All comments are subject to our
terms of use policy.
