A Voice in the Wilderness
columnist: R.J. Moeller

Topic: Economics
Baldwin's Hunt For Red Taxation

---

Even Alec Baldwin can see how self-defeating liberal economic policies are

---

by R.J. Moeller
(conservative)
Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Alec Baldwin is one of the most talented actors alive today. I mean it. I am a huge fan. He's given masterful performances in both action and drama films, and now stars alongside Saturday Night Live alums Tina Fey and Tracy Morgan in the funniest show on television: NBC's 30 Rock. Baldwin is a proud, outspoken advocate of his liberal political leanings that, it would be fair to say, are representative of those held by most of the actors and actresses in Hollywood.

But who knew this same multi-talented, uber-liberal guy, the one who famously threatened to move out of the country in 2004 should conservative George W. Bush be re-elected president, was an Adam Smith supply-side economist to-boot?

I guess to be fair to Baldwin's proud Leftist reputation, he only really opposes excessive taxation and over-reaching government intervention when it affects his own profession.

You see, for many years the state government in New York has given a 35% tax credit for any production company that films their television show or movie within its borders. Each state has a different policy on this. The tax credit that New York offers is what we in the biz of promoting free enterprise call an "incentive."

The government in New York, participating in its constitutionally-appointed duty to help facilitate commerce in and among the states, has in the past made the prospect of filming shows and movies in their state more attractive by offering big companies the tradeoff of lower taxes in return for their business. These production companies set up offices in New York, hire local workers to do everything from hold cameras to push brooms, and generate business and income for the Granite State in a million other smaller ways that would be impossible to fully calculate. Everyone benefits, just like Adam Smith envisioned.

But just this month, Governor David Patterson, a Democrat, has made a threat of his own, and it is one that appears to be infinitely more serious and important than Baldwin's re-location oath of 4 years ago.

In lieu of the state's gargantuan $7 billion budget deficit, one caused by over-spending and unprecedented levels of corruption, mismanagement, and incompetence within the government, Patterson says that the tax breaks for production companies might soon be one of those "incentives" that will be rescinded.

To this Alec Baldwin rightly, if not ironically, says: Phooey!

"I'm telling you right now," Mr. Baldwin declared, "if these tax breaks are not re-instated in to the budget, film production in this town [New York City] is going to collapse. Television production is going to collapse. And it is all going to go to California."

Bingo. Alec, you not only just made the case for why free markets cannot work in an over-taxed, over-regulated environment, you courageously overcame the typical liberal urge to deny common sense when economics is involved.

Baldwin's surprising flip-flop from the Leftist compulsion to always favor higher levels of everything as far as the government's involved is simply yet another clear-cut case of mistaken political identity. You see, the liberalism most on the Left intend to espouse is the feel-good, look out for the "little guy", "make love not war" platitude-ridden malarkey we hear from, say, college students whose English teacher has taught them all they know about economics and US history. These kinds of people don't mean to be misinformed, and their intentions are almost always pure. But there is a huge disconnect between what most liberals want liberalism to be and what actually happens when their government taxes and spends like there is no tomorrow.

The realities of life, complex economies, and delicate relations with hostile foreign nations does not easily lend itself to the hypothetical ramblings of, for example, someone who gets paid millions of dollars to pretend for a living, like Mr. Baldwin.

For him, and many in Hollywood, politics is a game played every other November by people trying desperately to garner even more attention they don't deserve. It obviously never dawned on Alec Baldwin as he clapped at fundraisers over the years for one liberal Democrat after another that when those politicians promised to punish the wealthy, greedy corporations in the United States that the list might include companies such as Paramount, MGM, or even NBC.

But now the free-range chickens have come home to organically roost.

Despite their voting and legislative practices, liberals consistently show that they know raising taxes on goods or services is a way to discourage that good or service. Take, for example, tobacco. Few products are more heavily scrutinized and taxed than cigarettes. Commercial campaigns led predominantly by liberal groups certainly help to spread the word about the risks involved with smoking, but the real way in which most Democrats in most states attack "Big Tobacco" is through higher levels of taxation. When they don't want something to enjoy success, they tax it.

And here again, in the example of Governor Patterson's attempt to repeal tax credits for production companies filming in his state, we see through the public statements of a life-long liberal like Alex Baldwin that even he recognizes the devastating effect higher taxes will have on an industry and thousands of jobs. This isn't rocket science, people. Baldwin understands it.

The tough truth for prominent liberals to swallow is that free market conservatives and libertarians are not all conniving, selfish money-changers who want decreased levels of taxation and government intervention for their own personal gain. The economy is a complicated, inter-connected web of trade and commerce that requires some basic things like voluntary participation (i.e. deciding to work in the movie industry instead of being a banker or teacher) and a largely hands-off relationship with the government (i.e. Governor Patterson arbitrarily deciding to punish the movie industry because of his own government's ineptness). Sadly, foundational principles of the American economic system are rejected by many who consider themselves Left-of-Center simply because it is free market conservatives or libertarians promoting them these days.

But give even the most ardent Leftist a healthy dose of economic reality, let taxation and over-regulation take the millstone from his or her own hand, and you'll hear eloquent defenses of the free market system that would make even old Milton Friedman smile from grave.

I don't hate Alec Baldwin, and I mean no real disrespect when I call him a liberal. He is entitled to his opinions and positions just as much as anyone else. And, most importantly, Baldwin is absolutely right to say what he did. He could not be more justified in voicing his displeasure with the state of New York hurting an industry he has a stake in.

But why does he then vote for, publicly endorse, and financially support the very same party and ideology that proudly promises to continue such economically-crippling, short-sighted policies should they gain more power? Why do so many liberals become enraged when companies move overseas or out of state due to high taxes, but then cheer when their candidates promise to raise taxes and increase regulation on those same companies?

I would simply ask those of you reading this today to take some time from your busy schedules and begin to learn more about both the levels and types of taxation your government levies against you. Stay on top of the spending habits of your mayor, your governor, and certainly your president. All of this information is out there and a matter of public record. Too many Republicans failed to do this while their party was in power 6 of the last 8 years, and that failure to curtail spending (and the growth of the federal government) has in many ways landed us in the tight spot we find ourselves in today.

Support lower taxes and decreases in spending and you will see the economy correct itself. This shouldn't be a Right or Left issue. Not in America.

Did you like this article?
If you did, Thumb It!
15 thumbs so far

©2009 R.J. Moeller, all rights reserved. You must have written permission from the author in order to republish this work.
Published: Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Last modified: Tuesday, April 7, 2009

The views expressed in this article are those of R.J. Moeller only and do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. R.J. Moeller is solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.

Report violation by R.J. Moeller of Nolan Chart LLC's terms of use policy.