Inherited knowledge, not personal efforts, mostly explains becoming rich. by Joel S. Hirschhorn
(liberal)
Saturday, November 22, 2008
Like a law of physics, corrupt politics, unshared national wealth and uncontrolled greed combine to produce economic inequality and delusional prosperity. Now comes a book that should have been titled Stolen Wealth. This would have been more consistent with its long subtitle: How the Rich Are Taking Our Common Inheritance and Why We Should Take It Back.
In today's world of economic crashes and calamity it comes to this: Should there be higher taxes on the richest people in society? Gar Alperovitz and Lew Daly make a very sound case that considerable research demonstrates that a huge fraction of the success of the wealthiest people results from inherited knowledge that society at large owns. The incredible economic inequality we see today, therefore, is morally unacceptable.
If President-elect Obama and his many economic advisors buy into the intellectual arguments presented in this book, which is very likely, then we can expect a strong push for higher rates of federal taxation on the highest incomes and capital gains, as well as on accumulated wealth by higher inheritance taxes. This book presents the central argument for such public policies, namely the incredible importance of inherited knowledge accumulated over long periods that forms the basis for financial success by some individuals. Their smartness, creativity and hard work cannot explain their disproportionate wealth. It largely results from inherited, accumulated knowledge from the past.
According to this understanding, it is not so much about redistribution of wealth from the richest people to everyone else, it is more about the morally correct and necessary action to rectify the unjust and immoral ownership of wealth that a relatively small fraction of the population has improperly (though legally) attained.
What Americans need to be told by politicians is that "ever-increasing knowledge, accumulating across the generations, is central to the creation of all wealth," according to the authors. Therefore the proper role of government is to ensure that many more people get some of this wealth. And the practical way to do this is through higher taxation of the unjust deserts now enjoyed by the Upper Class.
Looking at this another way: the economic decline of the middle class and the expansion of the working poor result from all these unjust deserts. All the unshared wealth that has resulted from inherited knowledge that a few people have managed to unfairly benefit from. This has produced rising economic inequality and increased economic suffering by so many Americans.
This is not the easiest book to read because it is written in an academic rather than a populist style. Nevertheless, for anyone that wants better justification for "taxing the rich" public policies it is essential reading. Another good title for the book would have been: Battling Economic Injustice.
Did you like this article? If you did, Thumb It! 3
thumbs so far
The views expressed
in this article are those of Joel S. Hirschhorn only and
do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates.
Joel S. Hirschhorn is solely responsible for the contents
of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated
with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
Hi Joel, what exactly is the "inherited knowledge"? A very simple way to rectify the capital gains problem is to abolish it and classify it properly under "income". That is all it is and should be taxed as such. There is no reason in the world to tax labor higher than capital and for that matter higher or lower than resource, IF you are going to tax them all, they should be taxed equally otherwise you get the unbalance [bloated capital markets] that we have now. I wrote an article [Is there a Just Tax], I would be interested in your opinion on it if you had the time.
You should see the beating I had to endure afterwards, via the reader comments.
Not that I'm asking for pity, but it must be noted that virtually all the greatest advocates for social justice had to fight like hell for it. It's never a task for the timid.
Want to comment on
this article? Leave your comment
here. Your email address is required to track your
comment. However, we will neither publish your email
address nor distribute it to other organizations or
persons. The only reason we might use it would be if
we needed to contact you regarding your comment. All
comments are subject to our
terms of use policy.
