Using privatization the Bush administration is wasting billions of taxpayer dollars by using contractors. by Joel S. Hirschhorn
(liberal)
Thursday, September 4, 2008
The Bush administration has found yet another way to waste taxpayer money while providing huge sums to private contractors. According to a survey of activities in 2007 by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, about a third of the federal professional intelligence workforce now consists of contractors, mostly in the Washington, DC area.
Â
Out of a total workforce of about 100,000 people some 37,000 are private employees that cost the government (we taxpayers) about $207,000 annually, compared with about $125,000 for civilian federal employee's salaries and benefits.
Â
Contractors have lured people with important skills with higher salaries and benefits and have also siphoned off federal employees. With this outsourcing, taxpayers are the losers.
Â
What does this $82,000 worker cost gap amount to yearly? About $3 billion annually is being provided to private contractor businesses that could be avoided by hiring government employees. This is incredible Bush administration fiscal insanity, but totally consistent with how Republicans changed their views on the federal government.
Â
In the past, Republicans used to focus on shrinking the federal government and its spending. But then it shifted because they saw how increased federal spending could be used to increase revenues to the corporate sector, even though this requires incredible deficit spending, borrowing and costly debt. What has happened in the intelligence sector has also happened in the defense area. In other words, huge numbers of contractors perform in Iraq in addition to our military personnel.
Â
To be clear, all these figures do not include workers such as food-service employees or contract guards, but only those actually performing or assisting intelligence functions. Here is the breakdown for the latter: about 27 percent do intelligence collection and operations, just under 25 percent are involved in information technology services, about 20 percent are in analysis and production, and 20 percent work in administration and support functions.
Â
Tim Shorrock, author of "Spies For Hire: The Secret World of Intelligence Outsourcing," noted that the new data "shows that private contractors are operating in the most sensitive areas of intelligence."Â He has also noted that "an astounding 70 percent of the U.S. intelligence budget is spent on private contracts. With the post-Sept. 11 hikes in intelligence spending, spying for hire has become an industry worth nearly $50 billion a year."
Â
IntelligenceCareers.com is a recruitment firm headed by William D. Golden, a former Army intelligence officer. Â Golden says his company can hardly keep up with the demand for intelligence contractors. "The government has become addicted to the use of private industry in the world of intelligence," he said.
Â
If Obama wins the election and actually tries to undo most of the awful and fiscally stupid things done by the Bush administration, then he should mount an effort to de-privatize and in-source federal agencies, starting with the intelligence sector, saving many billions of dollars annually.
The views expressed
in this article are those of Joel S. Hirschhorn only and
do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates.
Joel S. Hirschhorn is solely responsible for the contents
of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated
with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
Posted By: Walt Thiessen
Date: 2008-09-05 04:53:24
Good article overall, although I take issue with you that the problem is "privatizing." The real problem is too much government power. Putting contractors back onto government payrolls isn't going to solve much of anything, just as "privatizing" didn't solve anything. You can't make any real progress until the government power is reduced. If that could be accomplished, then it wouldn't really matter whether they were contractors or on government payroll, because the bigger goal of having fewer of them overall would have been achieved, and overall costs would have thereby been reduced.
The real question should center on whether this activity is even necessary or justified in the first place. Every person employed by the government, contractor or not, is yet another person not being occupied at some other useful, marketable purpose. Instead of being an asset to their society, they become a tax burden (liability). Maintaining a large intelligence gathering network is really no different to maintaining a large standing army. Neither is acceptable in a free society.
Want to comment on
this article? Leave your comment
here. Your email address is required to track your
comment. However, we will neither publish your email
address nor distribute it to other organizations or
persons. The only reason we might use it would be if
we needed to contact you regarding your comment. All
comments are subject to our
terms of use policy.
