Nolan Chart
Home Be a Columnist Logon Columns Survey FAQ Newsletter Contact Print Advertise Other

The Voice of the Irate, Tireless Minority
columnist: Jim Quinn

Like This Article?
Thumb It!
82 thumbs so far

Topic: Ron Paul
Government Deception - Ron Paul, the only one telling the Truth

Our Country is in the midst of the greatest fiscal crisis in history. Meanwhile, our government manipulates economic data to convince the public that everthing is fine. Ron Paul is the only voice of reason and truth regarding our dire situation.
by Jim Quinn
(Libertarian)
Thursday, June 26, 2008

Our country is in a pickle. As usual, Congressman Ron Paul sums up the situation succinctly.

"The national debt now stands in excess of $9 trillion, more than $30,000 per person. The total future debt obligations of the United States, including entitlements, are estimated at $59 trillion, which equates to over $500,000 per household. Social Security and Medicare will likely consume the entire federal budget by 2040, threatening the average American with an impossible tax burden. For over 30 years, I have been urging all Americans to educate themselves about monetary policy in order to better understand how a small group of unelected individuals at the Fed and the Treasury Department wield tremendous power over our lives."

The politicians who run this country do not want the general public to know how bad the situation truly is. Therefore, governmental agencies spin all data in the most positive way to keep the masses in the dark. The massive corporations that contribute millions to these politicians, cook their books, take huge risks and then beg for the government to bail them out when their bets blow up. Meanwhile, the average American doesn't question the information their government and corporations feed them - Living a life of self imposed delusion.

 There are many people who believe there is a governmental conspiracy to systematically fake the numbers regarding our economy. I do not believe that is true. Our government is the biggest bureaucracy in the world. Bureaucracies are run by bureaucrats that want to retain their positions. These bureaucrats try to please their masters. This leads them to tweak every process trying to "improve" the output. The tweaking always makes the figures slightly more positive. After many years, the continuous positive tweaking of the numbers has led to monthly figures that are at best misleading and at worst completely false. This is why we have such disconnect between the economic figures put out by the government and how people feel about their personal situation.

The number of Americans who believe the country is moving in the wrong direction has risen sharply, to nearly eight in ten, amid soaring food and gas prices, falling home values and unending war. Just 17 percent say the country is going in the right direction, according to an AP-Ipsos poll. The AP announcement of these results hits at the heart of the problem. "The survey reinforces the notion that consumers are particularly gloomy - possibly more than economic statistics justify. Despite record energy costs, slumping stock prices and the housing and credit crunch, reports show the economy to be still growing, if slowly. Inflation and interest rates remain at relatively tame levels. And the unemployment rate is lower than it was during the past two recessions, in 1990 and 2001." Tom Raum, the AP writer, is unaware that those economic statistics have been positively skewed over time. Therefore, he doesn't connect the numbers to American's gloom.

I hear pundits like Larry Kudlow expound on the great American economy. They reference how bad it was in 1980 compared to today. In 1980 inflation was out of control after years of fiscal mismanagement and loose Federal Reserve policies. It took Paul Volker raising rates to almost 20% to kill inflation. When the pundits compare the CPI that is published today to the CPI in the past, it is an apples to oranges comparison. For a true comparison, you must add 7% to whatever the government publishes. If the American public thought that inflation was running at a rate above 11%, there would be an outcry for wage increases above the current 3% average.

 The implications of this discrepancy explain why people don't feel like they are getting ahead. The average American is paying in excess of 11% for the items they need to buy, while their wages go up by 3% or 4%. No wonder they feel that they are falling behind. They are! The adjustments to CPI over the years have had the effect of reducing social security payments. John Williams, who has done the groundwork on these adjustments, comes to the conclusion that "the reporting system increasingly succumbed to pressures from miscreant politicians, who were and are intent upon stealing income from social security recipients, without ever taking the issue of reduced entitlement payments before the public or Congress for approval." We have Alan Greenspan and Michael Boskin to thank for the most recent "improvement" to the data. Their adjustments to CPI are best summed up again by John Williams:

"The Boskin/Greenspan argument was that when steak got too expensive, the consumer would substitute hamburger for the steak, and that the inflation measure should reflect the costs tied to buying hamburger versus steak, instead of steak versus steak. Of course, replacing hamburger for steak in the calculations would reduce the inflation rate, but it represented the rate of inflation in terms of maintaining a declining standard of living. Cost of living was being replaced by the cost of survival. The old system told you how much you had to increase your income in order to keep buying steak. The new system promised you hamburger, and then dog food, perhaps, after that."

Does the 11.6% inflation rate seem crazy? If so, then the government has successfully pulled the wool over your eyes. Examine the chart below carefully. The government is telling you that your costs have increased less than 30% in the last 8 years. A barrel of oil has gone up almost 500%, a gallon of gas over 200%, and corn and wheat almost 300%. Home prices were up 60%. So, in the real world prices are 8 to 10 times higher than what the government is telling you. The average American is clearly falling behind. The true misery index (unemployment rate + inflation rate) is near the all-time high. This explains why the University of Michigan sentiment index was the lowest since 1980 in June.

CategoryJanuary, 2000Today% Change
Consumer Price Index, Total (per BLS)168.8216.6328.3%
Consumer Price Index, Less Food & Energy (per BLS)178.8215.1820.3%
    
Consumer Price Index, Energy (per BLS)124.6257.1106.3%
Consumer Price Index, Food (per BLS)166.6212.2527.4%
    
Barrel of Oil (per EIA)$23.50$137.00483.0%
Gallon of Unleaded Gasoline (per EIA)$1.30$4.08213.8%
    
Bushel of Corn (per CBT)$2.14$7.60255.1%
Bushel of Wheat (per CBT)$2.27$8.84289.4%
    
Average Price of Homes Sold (per Census Bureau)$200,300$321,00060.3%

A 72 year old, risk averse grandmother, with a husband in a nursing home and $100,000 in her IRA is now only able to get 2% to 3% in CDs or a money market fund. She is paying 10% to 20% more for food, energy, and health care. The most susceptible Americans, our senior citizens, are being sacrificed to benefit the huge banks who loaned money to people who could never pay them back, and now need to be saved. Ben Bernanke and the Fed have chosen to throw the savers under the bus to prop up banks that are essentially bankrupt. Not surprising, considering the Federal Reserve is essentially owned by the banks they are propping up.

The misleading CPI figures contribute to the false readings on GDP. I have heard numerous talking heads over the last month say that we aren't in a recession because GDP has not gone negative. The GDP numbers are adjusted for inflation. If we are underestimating true inflation by 7%, then GDP is systematically overstated. When adjusted for the true CPI, our economy has been in a recession for most of the last 8 years. No wonder that Americans are in such a bad mood. Maybe if we had used the $600 billion that have been poured into the "War on Terror" for productive initiatives in the United States, we wouldn't have had such lethargic growth.

In America, anyone can become rich. This is a hallmark of capitalism. The reason the vast majority of people don't feel like they are getting ahead is because they aren't. According to Jim Jubak, "Incomes are a lot less equal than they used to be. In 1979, for example, the top 1% of earners had an income 9.4 times that of the average person in the bottom 90%, according to the Economic Policy Institute. By 2006, that ratio had climbed to almost 20-to-1." This is the classic rich getting richer and poor getting poorer story. Real average weekly earnings for all Americans over the last four decades has been cut in half due to the persistent year after year inflation. Workers no longer can rely on unions to fight for wage increases. Employers have the leverage to keep wages low, while everyday costs rise.

Again, the serial cheerleaders like Larry Kudlow and Ben Stein are on TV every day saying that the economy is not bad because the unemployment rate is only 5.5%. How could we have a recession with the unemployment rate at 5.5%? We can have a recession, because the unemployment rate is not really 5.5%. The government only reports the U3 rate, which is of course the lowest level. If you use the U6 rate, unemployment is currently 9%. U6 includes discouraged and marginally attached workers. Only our government would exclude people who want a job, but are discouraged because they can't get one. According to John Williams, "Up until the Clinton administration, a discouraged worker was one who was willing, able and ready to work but had given up looking because there were no jobs to be had. The Clinton administration dismissed to the non-reporting netherworld about five million discouraged workers who had been so categorized for more than a year." When you include these workers, the unemployment rate is in the range of 13% today, on par with the levels of the early 1980's.

The world breathlessly awaits the monthly figures on job gains or losses provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. There is usually a huge move in the stock market based upon these numbers. The fact is that they are not accurate within hundreds of thousands. They are a pure guess based upon models developed by these government bureaucrats. It takes up to two years before the figures are relatively accurate. Early in the Bush administration the BLS decided to make the monthly figures more "accurate" by making a birth/death adjustment to the reported figures. Amazingly, the adjustment makes the jobs picture more positive. This adjustment was supposed to take into account all the jobs created by small businesses that didn't make it into their monthly survey. Over a long period of time, this adjustment may make sense, but on a monthly basis at turning points in the economy is wildly wrong, like now. In the midst of an implosion in the housing market and a meltdown of the financial system, the BLS is telling the American public that we have added 115,000 construction jobs and 23,000 financial services jobs in the last three months. If you believe this, I have some beachfront property in Baghdad I'd like to sell you.

2008 Net Birth/Death Adjustment and
Total nonfarm over-the-month change, not seasonally adjusted (in thousands)
SupersectorJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Natural Resources & Mining-21112       
Construction-749284542       
Manufacturing-3647-109       
Trade, Transportation, & Utilities-6411222431       
Information-205235       
Financial Activities-3710689       
Professional & Business Services-10039237223       
Education & Health Services-111723111       
Leisure & Hospitality-2035448377       
Other Services-1447108       
Total Nonfarm -378135142267217       

Source: BLS

After all the slicing, dicing and manipulation of the data, the true picture is in the chart below. The disconnect that the mainstream media is reporting regarding people's mood about the economy is not a disconnect at all. Using the true figures, things are as bad as they were in 1980. The major difference is that the government and consumers now have massive amounts of debt to finance. If the Federal Reserve were to increase rates to where they should be, the whole Ponzi scheme would collapse. So, they keep rates at 2% and try to convince the unknowing masses that everything is just fine. 

Category19802008
Consumer Price Index (per BLS)14.0%4.2%
Consumer Price Index (measured the same as 1980) 11.8%
   
Unemployment (per BLS)7.6%5.5%
Unemployment (measured the same as 1980)  13.0%
   
GDP (as reported by government)1.3%1.0%
GDP (using proper inflation deflator) -2.5%
   
Federal Reserve Discount Rate11.0%2.0%

The only way to change what is going on in this country is to view everything that the government reports with a skeptical eye. Dig into the details to seek the truth. Listen to people who are willing to pull back the curtain and reveal that the Wizard of Oz is just a bumbling fool. Read the views of David Walker, Pete Peterson, John Mauldin, Barry Ritholtz, and Ron Paul to get the straight scoop on the economic situation of this country. Burying your head in the sand is not an alternative. As usual, Ron Paul sums up the situation as well as anyone.

"America became the greatest, most prosperous nation in history through low taxes, constitutionally limited government, personal freedom and a belief in sound money. Deficits have exploded, entitlements are out of control and our personal liberties are threatened like never before. The "solutions" proposed so far--stimulus packages, bailouts and interest rate cuts--just amount to printing more money, which will lead to greater currency devaluation, contribute to the rising costs of living, and further squeeze the middle class and our senior citizens."

Regarding the homeowner bailout bill (That was written by Bank of America) that is currently working its way through Congress, Ron's views are dead on.

"The solution is for government to stop micromanaging the economy and let the market adjust, as painful as that will be for some. We should not force taxpayers, including renters and more frugal homeowners, to switch places with the speculators and take on those same risks that bankrupted them. It is a terrible idea to spread the financial crisis any wider or deeper than it already is, and to prolong the agony years into the future. Socializing the losses now will only create more unintended consequences that will give new excuses for further government interventions in the future. This is how government grows - by claiming to correct the mistakes it earlier created, all the while constantly shaking down the taxpayer. The market needs a chance to correct itself, and Congress needs to avoid making the situation worse by pretending to ride to the rescue."

Did you like this article?
If you did, Thumb It!
82 thumbs so far

2008 Jim Quinn, all rights reserved.
Published: Thursday, June 26, 2008
Last modified: Thursday, June 26, 2008

The views expressed in this article are those of Jim Quinn only and do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. Jim Quinn is solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.

Report violation by Jim Quinn of Nolan Chart LLC's terms of use policy.


More Articles By Jim Quinn

Be A Columnist
Tell A Friend About This Article

Reader Comments:

Posted By: Joe
Date: 2008-06-26 10:21:17

Nice analysis, good article.  The economic day of reckoning is approaching.

Report violation


Posted By: Eric
Date: 2008-06-26 12:15:10

Well what is the best guess of what excatly will happen with this "economic day of reckoning"?

Whatever happens please follow this advice.

Buy canned food and grow an all year long substainable garden. If no room grow plants on your back porch in pots.

Get BB guns and 22 rifles for food.

The 22 can be used for protection as well. It is dependable and accurate. The ammo is cheap. You can carry hundres of rounds in your pocket. The 22 is over all a superior survival tool.

 Gold and silver as well as any precious metals should be saved for trade. Other luxeries can be traded as well.

 The people of the USA are not prepared to go third world and many will not be able to make do.

Report violation


Posted By: riviera1992
Date: 2008-06-26 18:15:47

BEYOND ECONOMICS 101: High oil prices have nothing to do with supply and demand.‏‏‏

 Lindsey Williams is a true patriot who speaks the truth about the evil International Banksters and how they've been manipulating global economies for years.
 
First documentary was done over a decade ago: 'Syndrome of Control' will blow your mind...... 
1/7   [link edited for length]
 
2/7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrek7t_EKDo&feature=related
 
3/7 [link edited for length]
 
4/7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5AynkXeNEA&feature=related
 
5/7 [link edited for length]
 
6/7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mO43TvGO8gQ&feature=related
 
7/7 [link edited for length]
 
 
One of the most enlightening documentary of all time:
 
THE ENERGY NON-CRISIS is still top 10 at Google videos and another must see.
[link edited for length]
 
Read the E-book here:  [link edited for length]
 

Report violation


Posted By: Mike Stahl
Date: 2008-06-27 03:47:06

Jim,

In some ways you are an optimist. You do not take into effect the effect of a potential malicious Chinese action agianst the economy.

Excepting that, the .22 solution above is sound, with the Chinese candidate, a 7.62 capability and a deeper.... understanding might be requisite. Not against invasion, mind you.

God, I truly hope not.

Report violation


Posted By: Eric
Date: 2008-06-27 06:35:45

What also will happen when all thes countries that have lent us money (especially the Chinese) come to collect the debts and we don't have any money to pay them back?

Would the only way to pay them back would be to forfit the country?

What happens when the economic collaspe happens?

The way I see it me and you did not make the debt so it is not our responsibility.

May the bankers/royality get what they deserve if there is enough people who can figure this out.   

It's the EU against us because to their benifit it is for us to fall and they become number one economic power BUT they never counted on the chinese!.

China's economey is already number one (see the CIA factbook)and they will drain us out to a dry husk and then take the EU and do the same. Sadly there are so many chinese PACs out there that until we outlaw all PACs or expose them (GO RON PAUL LIBERTY GROUP) our politicians will continue to sell us out. UNLESS THE PEOPLE TAKE ACTION AND VOTE THE SELLOUTS OUT! 

Look out bankers because I bet you never expected China to build a super port on the Pacfic side of Mexico and trick you out of your NAFTA transfere of wealth plan!  You feeling stupid now?

Report violation


Posted By: mike montagne
Date: 2008-06-29 12:37:50

Jim,

We're arguably in economic failure now, and we will never reach 2040 before that failure is full blown. I provided the Reagan Administration computer models which, by calculating multiplication of debt by practiced patterns of interest and growth, projected full blown failure under a terminal sum of debt at approximately 2010 AD from 1983.

To your credit, your federal debt figures are conservative by many alternate ways of determining them; and, by others' reckonings as well, escalation of unfunded further liabilities (owing to borrowing from Peter [social securty and so forth] to pay Paul [any other program]) amounted to as much as 100 trillion two years ago.

Given the possible accuracy of these reckonings, and further "undiscovered" facts such as false leveraging or anticipated asset appreciation which will fail with further deterioration/collapse, the actual per capita condition of the prospective failure can be far worse than you give.

While I commend Mr. Paul for standing up against these atrocities, I believe he has squandered the best opportunity we have had in the last 100 years to right our country, because he has constantly raised false assertions of cause and solution which far too many of us see through.

If for instance inflation and deflation are defined respectively as increases/decreases in circulation per related wealth, then obviously, by the most elementary math, we know that we can only solve inflation and deflation by maintaining a circulation which is perpetually equal to the related wealth.

We can only do that by introducing so much circulation as the market determines the value of the respective wealth, and by paying off a related monetary obligation equal only to that, at the rate of consumption or depreciation.

Mr. Paul does not advocate this solution.

Likewise, contrary to his assertion of devaluation of the dollar by "inflation" he has never proven, the prospective collapse is engendered by inherent multiplication of debt in proportion to the circulation, as we are compelled to maintain a circulation to service debt, and to maintain a circulation, we are compelled to re-borrow principal and interest paid out of the general circulation, with the necessity to replenish the circulation thus perpetually increasing the sum of debt so much as periodic interest.

Paul, Vieira, Griffin, and other Austrians of course do not even recognize this process (see my invalidation of Griffin at: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-invalidation-of-griffin-creature-from-jekyll-island.html)

But we solve it only by eradicating interest -- which the Austrians on the contrary advocate. So, without any better attempt at invalidating the process than Griffin's preposterous effort, the Austrians (who likely will assert communism, socialism, collectivism, or lack of free markets or an adversity to math as they always do) only commit us to the failure ahead. Of course, they don't advocate an alternate solution, because there is one and one only solution to inflation/deflation, systemic manipulation of the cost/value of money or property, and inherent multiplication of debt by interest (which they don't even recognize).

So finally, mathematically perfected economy solves systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, by its elementary solutions of inflation/deflation and systemic multiplication of debt by interest -- which are the only powers a monetary system has to manipulate the cost or value of money or property.

Ron Paul not only does not advocate that singular solution, he continues to evade debating it, and continues to assert false cause for instance for price inflation -- he attributes price inflation to circulatory inflation, despite no formal proof or theorem of same, and despite the fact that I proved long ago that the only systemic cause of price inflation is inherent multiplication of debt by interest.

Worse, Mr. Paul and his Austrian friends who always take the opportunity to sling insults in return to these facts, can hardly prove the circulatory inflation he claims when the circulation is far less than the value of all wealth.

So he advocates returning to a gold standard, when monetary reserves can hardly sustain a circulation sufficient to sustain industry far exceeding that circulation -- even claiming while works Franklin produced when he was just 23 disprove his assertion, that gold will endow the money with a consistent, perpetual value, which only mathematically perfected economy maintains by always preserving a circulation free in its entirety to be redeemed only in that wealth, free and capable in its entirety to resolve the remaining monetary obligations, and free from servicing interest or multiplying debt by interest.

Mr. Paul, you may recall, yet uses my term, "insoluble debt" -- a term I introduced in 1979 in my original formal proof of inherent multiplication of debt (later stolen by authors of "The Debt Virus" and so forth), and of singular solution to all these irregularities in mathematically perfected economy.

If Mr. Paul does not recognize the process of multiplication of deb ty interest; and if Austrians are to continue advocating interest even if this proposition is true, then how is Mr. Paul even truly advocating the problem, his authority/authorship of solution, or the facts by which we can determine either as truth?

So you see, Mr. Paul is certainly not the only one trying to tell the truth; and if "the revolution" which existed long before he even claims to have taken an interest in "economics" is to prevail, we're going to have to determine *which* is the truth,, and who is really advocating it.

Report violation


Posted By: mike montagne
Date: 2008-06-29 12:47:02

Furthermore, in regard to Ron's position on the cited bill, I'll stand with him in certain important respects:

"The solution is for government to stop micromanaging the economy and let the market adjust, as painful as that will be for some. We should not force taxpayers, including renters and more frugal homeowners, to switch places with the speculators and take on those same risks that bankrupted them. It is a terrible idea to spread the financial crisis any wider or deeper than it already is, and to prolong the agony years into the future. Socializing the losses now will only create more unintended consequences that will give new excuses for further government interventions in the future. This is how government grows - by claiming to correct the mistakes it earlier created, all the while constantly shaking down the taxpayer. The market needs a chance to correct itself, and Congress needs to avoid making the situation worse by pretending to ride to the rescue."

He's absolutely right that we should not allow speculators to take freely from the pool of wealth on the one hand, and relieve them of responsibility of *their* consequences by putting the costs of their mis-doings on the taxpayer, renter, etc.

But the solution is not to call the market free, when it is subject further to the involuntary servitude of multiplication of debt by interest, and to promotion of cost by usurers, who for profit maximize debt.

That "market" is no more free than any other slave. 

The solution is to refinance all this debt under mathematically perfected economy. Thus a $100,000 home with a 100-year lifespan would cost us $1,000/year or $83/month. 

Then and then alone will *A FREE MARKET* be paying for the production of others *WITH* whatever that free market determined was the value of that wealth.

 

I'll try to embed the link to my invalidation of Griffin:

[link edited for length]

Report violation


Want to comment on this article? Leave your comment here. Your email address is required to track your comment. However, we will neither publish your email address nor distribute it to other organizations or persons. The only reason we might use it would be if we needed to contact you regarding your comment. All comments are subject to our terms of use policy.

Leave A Comment

Your Name:  

Your Email Address*:  

Your Comment: