Nolan Chart
Home Be a Columnist Logon Columns TAKE OUR SURVEY FAQ Newsletter Contact Print Ads Banners Links

The Pen is Mightier than the Shock and Awed
columnist: Freedom Writer

Like This Article?
Thumb It!
5 thumbs so far

Topic: War
The War Party


by Freedom Writer
(libertarian)
Sunday, May 25, 2008

Nevermind the Republicrats. Might as well combine both parties and call them the War Party.

The frontrunner War Party candidate is Obama.

Cindy Sheehan calls Obama O'Bomba. Here are some of O'Bomba's comments regarding Iran:

1. Chicago Tribune article written by David Mendell September 25, 2004 U.S. Senate candidate Barack Obama suggested Friday that the United States one day might have to launch surgical missile strikes into Iran and Pakistan to keep extremists from getting control of nuclear bombs."

2. Obama: Iran threatens all of us... Won't rule out force in speech in Chicago to pro-Israel group on March 3, 2007 written by Dave Newbart

Sen. Barack Obama said Friday the use of military force should not be taken off the table when dealing with Iran, which he called "a threat to all of us."

3. Cindy Sheehan calls Obama O'Bomba. Here are some notable quotes from her speech:

"There's one party. It's the War Party."

"Obama... And I'd like to spell his name O'Bomba... Because he says that he could bomb Iran..."

Check out the video [link edited for length] It's well worth the view...

The second runner War Party candidate is McCain (otherwise known as McBombiran...)

So, when you hear McBombiran sing "Bomb, bomb Iran..." recall that he is from the same mold as his Republican cohorts Cheney and Gee I Duped Ya', plus his good Democrat friend Joe Lieberman. Take note that Cheney, Duped Ya', and Joe Lie..., at one time or another, have all spoken to their constituents about bombing Iran (see links below). And keep in mind that they are all part of the same Party. The War Party...

So, what about the third runner candidate, Hillary? Well, here's what she said on April 23, 2008:

"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran [if it attacks Israel]. In the next 10 years [does she expect 2 1/2 terms?], during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be totally able to obliterate them."

These are comforting words, aren't they? Israel has more nuclear weapons than all of the other Middle Eastern countries put together (and then some....). Gee, I wonder what Hillary meant when she said "obliterate them"? (Those Iranians better stop building that nuclear power plant... they're sooooo dangerous!). I for one, am so glad to know that Hillary is such a peace-loving candidate. She sounds like a real democrat from the school of Truman, she's good at dropping bombs. Like the bomb she recently dropped about staying in the race, because, you know, assassinations can happen. Of course, according to Hillary, this comment was just a gentle reminder to help US remember what could happen..

The bottom line is, it doesn't matter if you call Hillary, O'Bomba, or McBombiran the Republicrats or the War Party, they will all do the same thing. That is, they will intervene in foreign countries and start more wars.

The only one that will not intervene or start wars like the war mongering CFR controlled puppets listed above is Ron Paul.

____________________

Obama on Iran: Take off the kid gloves :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Politics
The Truth Seeker - Obama would consider missile strikes on Iran
Who Wants to Bomb Iran? Dems, not the GOP, says Seymour Hersh
Lieberman: Bomb Iran If It Doesn't Stop, Conn. Senator Says The U.S. ...
Hillary: Bomb, Bomb Iran?
McCain Sings: "Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran," At Campaign Stop ...
The Raw Story | Report: Cheney aide clearing path to bomb Iran
Can Bush Be Stopped from Bombing Iran After the 2008 Elections?

Did you like this article?
If you did, Thumb It!
5 thumbs so far

©2008 Freedom Writer, all rights reserved. You must have written permission from the author in order to republish this work.
Published: Sunday, May 25, 2008
Last modified: Sunday, May 25, 2008

The views expressed in this article are those of Freedom Writer only and do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. Freedom Writer is solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.

Report violation by Freedom Writer of Nolan Chart LLC's terms of use policy.


More Articles By Freedom Writer

Be A Columnist
Tell A Friend About This Article
Leave A Comment

Reader Comments:

Posted By: Charles N. Steele
Date: 2008-05-25 14:02:37

More evidence: In his invited policy statement in Foreign Affairs, Obama's strategy for getting out of Iraq was   "let George do it," and  also noted that if there were certain particular signs of progress in Iraq, this position could be converted to "stay."  The conditions are sufficiently vague that they are almost automatically satisfied.  See p. 2 of:

 [link edited for length]

 No matter who is president (among frontrunners) leaving Iraq won't be an option.  It would require a completely new paradigm in foreign policy, one which the mainstream politcos are not prepared to accept.

 Democrats and Republicans indeed constitute a war party, and they're unlikely to get us out until we're completely bankrupted and broken.

Report violation


Want to comment on this article? Leave your comment here. Your email address is required to track your comment. However, we will neither publish your email address nor distribute it to other organizations or persons. The only reason we might use it would be if we needed to contact you regarding your comment. All comments are subject to our terms of use policy.

Leave A Comment

Your Name:  

Your Email Address*:  

Your Comment: