Topic: Economics
The Postal Robber Barons It's time to end this nation's most enduring monopoly.by RS Davis
(Libertarian)
Thursday, May 15, 2008
So, the UK has a problem with the Royal Mail. And it all stems from an end to monopoly, and the fact that no bureaucracy can ever keep up with private enterprise. BBCNews reports:
Royal Mail's 350-year monopoly ended at the start of 2006, when other licensed operators were given the right to collect and deliver mail.
However, it is still obliged to deliver letters to and from anywhere in the UK at a uniform tariff.
It made a loss of 279m in the year to the end of March.
The American mail system is a monopoly still, as it is currently illegal for any of their main competitors - FedEx, UPs, Roadway, etc - to offer first class mail service.
In fact, it's been illegal since 1872. And it has been challenged for nearly as long. Thomas Jefferson viewedthe Post Office as "a source of boundless patronage to the executive, jobbing to members of Congress and their friends and a bottomless abyss of public money."
The government did absolutely everything they could to shut him down, including siezing the mail, levying fines, and exorbitant legal costs. Within seven months, he was done.
The government can compel you to support one of its business ventures, but a private company cannot. In a free-market economy, the only time a transaction takes place is when both parties benefit from it. You see, the only reason you buy something is because the value of that item to you is greater than the value of the money you trade for it, and the only reason someone sells something is when the money that is offered in trade is worth more to them than the object they want to trade.
But this is not true with a government-enforced monopoly. You give them money that you don't want to give for services you don't use, and you do it at gunpoint. (To see the gun, simply stop paying your taxes.)
Pretend you are the prospective monopolist, and you make flying cars. (Weren't we supposed to have those by now?) And say with the costs of rent, labor, and materials, you can build one flying car for $10,000. Since you have no competitors, you can charge anything you want for the Aeromobile 3000. So you charge $20,000 for your cars because you figure a 100% markup is a pretty good profit. Then you sit back and wait for the money to roll in.
And it sure doesfor all of about twenty seconds. Other potential businesspeople see your huge profits and say, "Holy crap! There's gold in them thar hills!" Suddenly there is a rush on to put out flying cars like yours. But they do something a little different. They think, hey, if they sell theirs for, say, $18,000, they can undercut you and steal your market share. They're right. So you drop your price to $17,000, and a new startup comes along selling theirs for $16,000 and so on until you reach what economists call market equilibrium.
Well, that's no way to run a monopoly. So, what can you do now? Well, there is only one way to raise prices and not encourage competition: the heavy hand of government. It is currently illegal to compete with Amtrak and the Post Office. So what can we as consumers do when Amtrak or the Post Office raise prices? Really only one thing:
Bend over.
Fortunately, the market is a powerful thing. If they don't have to, people won't pay over the fair market price for anything. That is why people use UPS and FedEx to ship packages, pay their bills online, send online greeting cards, and use email. That is why people fly, drive, take cabs, take busses, and carpool.
And the market is a powerful thing. Look at it this way. For years, UPs and Fedex have been offering more and more services for cheaper and cheaper rates. The Post Office, on the other hand, keeps raising their rates, the last increasejust this past Monday. Add to that the fact that your tax money also pays part of the bill, and you can see just how badly the Post Office would compete on the open market.
This effect can be seen, for sure, in the UK example. Since they ended the monopoly in 2006, look what's happened:
The postal regulator has called for Royal Mail to be partly privatised to safeguard the quality of the UK's mail delivery service.
Postcomm warned that Royal Mail's financial difficulties would worsen unless bold action was taken.
I'm actually quite delighted by this. The UK is taking the right approach. Rather than re-assert their monopoly, they are considering reducing it further and increasing competition. That is absolutely the right move. After all, since the demonopolization, "large companies had 'seen clear benefits from liberalisation - choice, lower prices and more assurance about the quality of the mail service.'"
Now, America needs to follow this example and end our own monopoly on first class mail delivery. And don't get me started on Amtrak.
Did you like this article? If you did, Thumb It! 4 thumbs so far
2008 RS Davis, all rights reserved.
Published: Thursday, May 15, 2008
Last modified: Thursday, May 15, 2008
The views expressed in this
article are those of RS Davis only and do not represent
the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. RS Davis is
solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an
employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
Abolishing the postal monopoly in this country itself would be probably one of the largest and most immediate changes we could make to shrink government bureaucracy.
All the institutions and federal employees could probably be privatized in some way via bidding wars, so there really is no loss. Plus, as most revenue used to support the Post Office is (or at least used to be) through stamps and other shipping taxes, it would probably free up a small, yet significant portion of the budget that we could use to fill other gaps.
Then again, I don't think there's really an libertarian here that would argue against this, so this really doesn't shed light on a solution on how we could go about doing this. But just as food for thought, what do you think would be a viable way to gain public support on this small issue?
I don't think they would have to level the playing field at all. I think as soon as they allow the competition, they're sunk.
Or do you mean, how do we get people to care enough to try it? Sheesh, if that's what you mean, your guess is as good as mine. This country medalled in apathy at the last Olympics.
The latter. I mean, it's obvious that government's not gonna relinquish control so easily, since such a solution has easily been viable for the last 40-50 some-odd years (at least). And obviously, people don't care enough to boycott the Post Office or organize any of the protests that they might do if this were something about killing the whales...
Apathy... I think we should all sit down and have a discussion about what to do bout that. I mean, the least we could do now would be to present our takes on the situation. It is my opinion that apathy must exist to some extent, or inevitably the people would wake up and stage a socialist revolution, due much to their ignorance. It's not so much that people don't care, but that they are distracted and the issues are compounded by false opposition and disinformation...
Well I agree with you, but I think there are much bigger problems to solve than the post office. There is the Iraq war, the $9 trillion debt, the $45 trillion in unfunded future liabilities, and countless intrusions on our rights.
Anyway the post office is already on the ropes since you can now send e-mail for free, anywhere in the world instantly. And you can send packages by private carrier. Besides the post office is one of the few things government does which is actually authorized by the constitution.
The Founders didn't foresee the Age of the Internet. It has singlehandedly spread the ideals they wanted for our country into an (in theory) uncontrollable medium. Also, the Post Office was made a monopoly simply to cement the federal gov't's status at the time.
Strip the bureaucratic monopoly away from Washington- you can cut spending AND start paying down the actual part of the debt. A legal monopoly is also an intrusion of our rights to free trade, is it not?
Sure there are bigger problems, but that shouldn't belittle the impact that ridding ourselves of the U.S. Post would actually cause.
Want to comment on this
article? Leave your comment here. Your email address is
required to track your comment. However, we will neither
publish your email address nor distribute it to other
organizations or persons. The only reason we might use
it would be if we needed to contact you regarding your
comment. All comments are subject to our
terms of use policy.