Topic: Globalism
Buy a Gun Because the NWO doesn't want you to.by Carter Braxton
(Libertarian)
Monday, March 3, 2008
The Bilderburg Group may be able to appoint the next president of the United States.
The CFR may be able to censor every word spoken over the airwaves.
The Zionist World Bank may own every Family Farm in America.
But WE are still here.
Who are we? We are Americans. We were Born on this Land, and it's Soil has Fed us.
We are Free.
Not BECAUSE of our laws, but IN SPITE of them.
We are free because we were born free. And because we will not permit any man to convince us that we are otherwise.
But freedom is not necessarily comfortable; and it WILL NOT maintain itself.
*** YOU ***, yes YOU, will need to fight for it before too long. So get ready now, before it's too late.
A semi-auto large caliber rifle (.308 / 7.62mm or larger), extra hi-cap (30-50-100 round) magazines and extra ammunition, may make the difference between you and the victims of the next Holocaust.
To the People of Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, and all other nations which the Banksters have caused the US Armed Forces to invade: WE STAND WITH YOU.
Our land has been invaded as well. Our government has been infiltrated. And we must now fight as you must.
LIBERTY - EQUALITY - FRATERNITY - JUSTICE
And someday PEACE.
Did you like this article? If you did, Thumb It! 12 thumbs so far
2008 Carter Braxton, all rights reserved.
Published: Monday, March 3, 2008
Last modified: Monday, March 3, 2008
The views expressed in this
article are those of Carter Braxton only and do not represent
the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. Carter Braxton is
solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an
employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
Posted By: Scott from Oregon
Date: 2008-03-03 14:53:02
"Not BECAUSE of our laws, but IN SPITE of them."
Ummmm. No, silly man. We have freedoms because we have laws, not in spite of them. There is an odd situation that occurs when you hav eno laws. It is called anarchy. When people behave exactly as they please, you have a loss of freedom, a gain in friction and violence, death rates skyrocket, sickness ensues....
Economies shut down, food becomes scarce. Base instincts of survival redevelope and all hell breaks loose.
I worry that someone with your lack of common sense would be armed. Now THAT idea scares the hell out of me.
Thumbs Up... I think Scott from Oregon may have inadvertently jumped to the wrong conclusion about your statement "Not BECAUSE of our laws but IN SPITE of them."
Correct me if I'm wrong, Mr. Fog, but I think the laws you had in mind when you wrote that sentence are probably ALL THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL "LAWS" that have been railroaded through the legislature? The kinds of "laws" that Fredric Bastiat wrote about in his brief but enduring treatise, "The Law," well worth reading by all, and available here:
No, I don't think you are recommending anarchy - but rather what Thomas Jefferson said, "I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."
I think you are FOR "the rule of law," and that the legislators who have been working to disarm us are the real anarchists.... Ice Fog, am I right? Scott, if seen this way, would you agree?
Posted By: Scott from Oregon
Date: 2008-03-03 17:38:27
I see laws as agreements between folks to abide in such a manner as to benefit as many within the group as possible. I see government as the apparatus that people use to create, agree upon and enforce those laws.
The trouble is, government has taken it upon themselves to perform greater tasks than the people are in need of and often to the detriment of those people. So yes, I agree that government should be made to follow the safeguards set in place by our founders to a large degree.
But the rule of law and laws in general promote maximum freedom and ease, if applied judiciously and sanely, and are not to be considered in opposition to being free.
These might be the same laws that now have approximately 1% of all Americans held in prison cells (http://tinyurl.com/yudzqf). These might be the same laws that enslave all Americans with unjust and unconstitutional taxation. These might be the same laws that are trying to make us beholden to the same nations and powerful organizations that we spilled blood to liberate ourselves from. These might be the same laws that put our future into the hands of the few rather than the many. These might be the same laws that even now give a runaway government the power to spy on anyone who just happens to view or comment on this page.
A law that is unjust is not worth subjecting oneself to. A law that is unjust is not worth killing our neighbors through the mechanisms of government over. Any law has only the power over me that I grant it to have. I will not obey the unjust laws where force is not a factor, and I will resent and work against such laws when force is a factor.
‘scott’(from Oregon, which reveals a lot), is obviously a “Liberal” troll. Don’t ignore it, no more than you ignore any of your enemies, but watch them more closely than your ‘friends’:
It's a whole lot easier to defend oneself from the random individual bent on doing violence than it is to defend against the machine because the machine has a bunch of paid employees.
I'd rather be robbed by the lone highwayman. At least HE doesn't have the backing of the whole government. At least HE has to risk his life to take my money.
But instead I am robbed by the government. And they do so with the backing of the whole armed and police forces (that are paid for with the proceeds of the robberies).
Government's just a racket. It's organized crime. They make us pay for "protection" and then they threaten, harass or kill anyone who tries to stand up to them.
You say we must fight soon, then say we must fight now. What you don't say is what is the defining moment that justifies pulling that trigger. What is the last straw? When the time comes, will it be obvious? Or too late?
As much as I share your sentiments, fighting words must be tempered with the ethics of war.
The initiation of violence is immoral. Unless you personally have been aggrieved, and have exhausted all civilized methods of justice, then you should not attack.
Other methods to bring down an empire are civil disobedience, as written by Thoreau and proven by Gandhi. If we are guilty of contributing to the coffers of the State that oppresses us, then we share culpability for our own enslavement.
Conscientious objection to any forced revenue collection is the answer to bring about change. This will require bravery and the willingness to live a minimalist existence.
If you are backed into a corner, like an animal, and have exhausted all attempts to be freed, then strike back, as nature intended.
But don't jump the gun. In the meantime, I'll follow your advise and buy mine.
For me personally the point at which I will have to start truly thinking "dangerous thoughts" will be when the Federal Government begins fully funding all local SWAT teams, no doubt ostensibly for security reasons. At that point it will only be a matter of time before they start acting on all that anti-Constitutional training we've heard about, and enforcing laws that should never have been written.
In my humble opinion, once the SWAT teams become fully Federalized then most of us will have the new brown-shirts living within our communities. It will then only be a matter of time before they start seizing weapons and begin acting with naked agression. Then people will be cornered and have to stand up on their own hind legs and fight back. At which point the neo-brown-shirts will be given the stark choice of stand with the people or stand with "the government", if they then choose to back tyranny then I can only conclude that they would choose to do me harm if given the opportunity, and at that point I do not feel that I would be initiating violence...but only responding to it.
Do you know where your local black-suited Nazis live? Do you know where your local statist politicians live? Do you know where your local hard corps "Liberal" freaks, who will elect someone to hire someone to break down your door and kill you and your family for not 'complying,' live? The siege mentality is death. Hoping 'maybe they won't come for us tonight, but pick on someone else' is slavery waiting for death.
Waypas: Do you live by your own words? Or are you simply an instigator? There is a profound difference between murder and the justified killing of self-defense.
Want to comment on this
article? Leave your comment here. Your email address is
required to track your comment. However, we will neither
publish your email address nor distribute it to other
organizations or persons. The only reason we might use
it would be if we needed to contact you regarding your
comment. All comments are subject to our
terms of use policy.
2008 Carter Braxton, all rights reserved.