Topic: Ron Paul
Michael Scheuer Says Ron Paul Understands Cause of Terrorism Former CIA bin Laden Unit head suggests both McCain and Obama clueless on terrorism while Paul understands the reasons behind terrorism.by Gary Wood
(Conservative Libertarian)
Saturday, February 23, 2008
According to Mr. Scheuer the real driving force behind terrorism is interventionism. In his interview on Hannity and Colmes yesterday he said, "What they hate us for is the unusually virulent strain of obsessive compulsive disorder that's present in the American governing class, and that's called interventionism. That's what the cause of this war is." This differs from what candidates like Obama, Clinton, and McCain say is the reason. It is not our liberty and freedom that creates the motivation for hating the U.S. it's our foreign policy He continued, "That's what the cause of this war is. And neither Mr. McCain, nor Mr. Obama, nor Mrs. Clinton, nor any of the rest of them who are in the campaign-except Mr. Paul, Mr. Kucinich perhaps-had that idea."
Mr. Sheuer is the author of many books including Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror. As the head of the CIA's bin Laden unit he was among those pointing to our foreign policy as the key reason bin Laden is able to recruit willing terrorists. In his comments he stated, "Mr. McCain is very confident, but he's clueless. Mr. Obama is equally clueless. They continue to tell Americans, 'These people are Islamo-fascists, and they hate us because of our freedoms,' and 'they hate us for our liberties.'"
In a speech before the House of Representatives in July of 2005 Paul said, "Understanding why they sacrifice themselves is crucial to ending what appears to be senseless and irrational." He referred to Robert Pape's Dying to Win and Congressman Paul concluded in his speech, "It is time for us to consider a strategic reassessment of our policy of foreign interventionism, occupation, and nation-building. It is in our national interest to do so and in the interest of world peace."
The differences between the candidates on this have been evident in many debates, especially the early debates where both John McCain and then candidate Rudy Giuliani decried Dr. Paul's position while mislabeling it as isolationism. Ron Paul has continued to emphasize the importance of a foreign policy change to aid in defeating terrorism. Dann McCreary's article, Ron Paul Tough on Terrorism, in announcing new advisors to the campaign states, "...the Ron Paul 2008campaign clearly recognizes the need for comprehensive intelligence, strategicanalysis, and effective preparation for all threats and eventualities, and has taken clear steps to assure voters that such concerns will be a high priority of a Paul administration."
At some point the voters must apply critical thinking to what this debate is really about. Those who have invested their efforts at truly understanding the thinking behind terrorism all are reaching the same conclusion. It is not our lifestyle of freedom; it is our government's on-going failed foreign policy. It is important that everyone casting a vote this year take the time to study this for themselves.
Even after the election it will be equally important for citizens to embrace a higher level of understanding while staying in constant contact with their elected representatives. After careful, in-depth study one begins to clearly see non-intervention is a very strong front that will lead to victory against terrorism. Representatives need to know those they work for, we the people and we are going to demand real changes in our foreign policy that will lead to real victory.
March of Liberty Radio Show Launch -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you enjoyed this article give it a thumbs up, bookmark it to your favorite site from the drop-down menu and suggest it to a friend. Thanks for taking the time to visit Nolan Chart, do come back often for the latest from all political views.
2008 by Gary Wood - Permission to copy with attribution granted.
Did you like this article? If you did, Thumb It! 53 thumbs so far
2008 Gary Wood, all rights reserved.
Published: Saturday, February 23, 2008
Last modified: Saturday, February 23, 2008
The views expressed in this
article are those of Gary Wood only and do not represent
the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. Gary Wood is
solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an
employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
Osama bin Laden stated in his September 7, 2007 message:
"If you want to understand what's going on and if you would like to get to know some of the reasons for your losing the war against us, then read the book of Michael Scheuer."
On the Mearsheimer and Walt book:
"They [Mearsheimer and Walt] should be credited for the courage they have had to actually present a paper on the subject. I hope they move on and do the Saudi lobby, which is probably more dangerous to the United States than the Israeli lobby."
"On Larry King Live, September 7, 2007, Scheuer alluded to the Fox News Republican Debate of Sept 5, 2007, where a Fox News moderator accused Ron Paul of taking 'marching orders' from Al Qaeda. Scheuer said, 'The truth of the matter is that it is all of the Democrats and the Republicans, except perhaps for Mr. Paul and Mr. Kucinich, who are marching to Osama Bin Laden's drum'."
It is good to hear these voices coming out. I'm sure if the producers of Hannity and Colmes would have seen this coming they wouldn't have invited him on. I think one of the critical lessons we need to teach at the laymen's level is the difference between isolationism and non-isolationism. The other candidates and MSM have wrongly labeled it. This will be an article I will focus on during the launch of Freeople next month.
Want to comment on this
article? Leave your comment here. Your email address is
required to track your comment. However, we will neither
publish your email address nor distribute it to other
organizations or persons. The only reason we might use
it would be if we needed to contact you regarding your
comment. All comments are subject to our
terms of use policy.