Nolan ChartNolan Chart
Home Be a Columnist Logon Columns TAKE SURVEY! Forums Media Page FAQ Contact Print Ads Links

Liberty Tree
columnist: Isaac Van Wart

Like This Article?
Thumb It!
4 thumbs so far

Topic: Presidential Campaign 2008
Freedom: Struggle for Individualism


Altruism, collectivism, and individual human liberty: an essay in favor of presidential candidate, Ron Paul.
by Isaac Van Wart
(libertarian)
Tuesday, February 5, 2008

Two hundred thirty-two years ago a small band of rebels rose in armed rebellion to cast off the yoke of oppressive government. When backwoods farmers and self-educated idealists rejected the tyranny of monarchy, oligarchy, and theocracy which had, for all of recorded human history, ruled the fate of men — and united in a single cause.

Individual human liberty.

The revolution was successful, and the principles of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness established the philosophical foundation of the United States of America, as written in our Constitution.

In the past one hundred years, a new ideology emerged which threatens our right to self-determination. The ideology is insidious because it is rooted in a natural human desire to want to help others: altruism.

Altruism has biological survival value for our species because it allows us to work together to overcome threats. To financially help a friend or neighbor. To pull a child from a burning building. To form a church, or a non-profit organization.

Voluntary altruism is moral.

The threat to individual human liberty occurs when altruism is institutionalized in the form of government. Institutionalized altruism is the tipping point when the needs or wants of the masses supersede rights of the individual. When the earned rewards of individual labors are involuntarily taken, and redistributed to those who claim to have the greatest need.

Compulsory altruism is unjust.

Compulsory altruism is called socialism, communism, or fascism. Collectivism. Every form of collectivism requires a hierarchy of leaders who determine how collective wealth is redistributed as welfare, or subsidies. Those leaders form an oligarchy — whether appointed or elected — and the circle is complete: the will of the few once again controls the behavior of the masses. This oligarchy seeks both foreign and domestic control.

Individual human liberty is the sacrifice.

The 2008 presidential election is a conflict of ideals. The terms "republican," "democrat," "conservative," or "liberal," are no longer specific enough to describe viewpoints. Instead, two diametrically opposed philosophies are in competition.

Collectivism vs. individualism.

Because an individual exchanges time (life) for resources (wealth), necessary to survive and prosper, any political candidate can be evaluated by his or her philosophical intentions regarding another person's wealth:
  1. Will it be collected and redistributed to others, according to desire or need?
  2. Or will it be used sufficient only to protect individual human liberty?
Against this measure, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, John McCain are all collectivists.
 
Ron Paul, alone among candidates, represents individualism.

For those of us who value individual human liberty, this struggle for independence — from the control of oligarchy and the desires of our neighbors — is not fought from behind fences and across open fields against an enemy in scarlet uniforms. This battle is fought electronically, using words and video and votes. Where our philosophical ancestors clutched longrifles, we carry laptops.
 
 

Did you like this article?
If you did, Thumb It!
4 thumbs so far

Share this article on Facebook: Share

Share on MySpace

Share on Twitter

©2008 Isaac Van Wart, all rights reserved. You must have written permission from the author in order to republish this work.
Published: Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Last modified: Tuesday, February 5, 2008

The views expressed in this article are those of Isaac Van Wart only and do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. Isaac Van Wart is solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.

Report violation by Isaac Van Wart of Nolan Chart LLC's terms of use policy.


More Articles By Isaac Van Wart

Be A Columnist
Tell A Friend About This Article
Leave A Comment

Reader Comments:

Posted By: Logical Premise
Date: 2008-02-05 07:59:21

A well written article, basically summing up why I won't be voting for Dr. Paul.

Report violation


Posted By: sandman
Date: 2008-02-05 08:25:49

Great analogy! Knowledge is the key to this movement. Keep writing!

Report violation


Want to comment on this article? Leave your comment here. Your email address is required to track your comment. However, we will neither publish your email address nor distribute it to other organizations or persons. The only reason we might use it would be if we needed to contact you regarding your comment. All comments are subject to our terms of use policy.

Leave A Comment

Your Name: 

Your Email Address*

Your Comment: