View Point
columnist: Kipper Mathews

Topic: Government
Red White and Blue...a Thing of the Past ?

---

Americans go through life hoping that the decisions we made in electing our government officials were the right ones. But in reality we don't know what goes on behind closed doors.

---

by Kipper Mathews
(Libertarian)
Sunday, February 3, 2008

As an investigative news reporter , one looks for subjects the he or she can write about that are important to most other people at any given time and will help them better to understand that subject, from the writers point of view. With aid of the Internet , some subjects are easy to come by, others you have to dig for. Often while in search of your first idea, you come across other subjects that absolutely must be reported, simply because you haven't seen them in your own news searches.

Case in point.

I was searching today for information regarding the true meaning of Conservative.

I read a few other articles that lead me here, then lead me there and ended up looking at government web sites. There I found records from Congressional House Resolutions (H Rs) that are available for all to see, if you were the slightest bit interested in all that. At that point I started looking for words that looked or sounded familiar and I came across a word I had read earlier, yet didn't know exactly what it meant.. That word totalization is much like globalization (related), that the government uses to describe a program they have been working on for decades.

However my word for the day was totalization and in our government it relates to global Social Security.
I had that same reaction you did when I saw it. WHAT ?

Often we hear George Bush saying how important it is for Congress to approve the free trade with yet another country, lately Mexico. To most Americans that means he wants to sign an agreement with Mexico regarding NAFTA. Sorry folks but that was done in 2004. What he is trying to push through now is Totalization, a.k.a. Global Social Security (GSS).

Roughly the GSS , is an agreement between Mexico and the USA stating that citizens of both countries working on both sides of the border in any given year only have to pay GSS taxes to the country in which said party was in for most of that fiscal year. On the surface that would be very beneficial to US business people working on both sides of the border. So they are not be taxed by the Social Security Administrations of both countries. A deeper look shows that workers from Mexico would be entitled to GSS for the work they do here PLUS the work they do in Mexico. The Social Security Protection (SSP) ACT of 2004 forbids illegal immigrants from claiming Social Security benefits but a loophole exists. If an immigrant gains what's called a valid work-authorized Social Security number then he or she could eventually file a claim for benefits.

How does that effect the people of the USA? It doesn't until both countries and Canada become one in 2010. Thats right The North American Union (NAU ) is scheduled to be in place by 2010. It was signed and sealed by George Bush in 2004. ( So much for conspiracy theories.)

Want to stop the Totalization before it starts ? Too Late !

The GSS has been around for decades, here are the Countries and dates they went into effect:

Italy November 1, 1978 Portugal August 1, 1989 Germany December 1, 1979 Netherlands November 1, 1990 Switzerland November 1, 1980 Austria November 1, 1991 Belgium July 1, 1984 Finland November 1, 1992 Norway July 1, 1984 Ireland September 1, 1993 Canada August 1, 1984 Luxembourg November 1, 1993 United Kingdom January 1, 1985 Greece September 1, 1994 Sweden January 1, 1987 South Korea April 1, 2001 Spain April 1, 1988 Chile December 1, 2001 France July 1, 1988 Australia October 1, 2002

The worst of that is... It would take a Presidential Order to stop it, and George Bush is for it. He and all the remaining Presidential Candidates except for one, are members of the CFR which is the think tank for the NAU. However that one candidate is being blocked from becoming President by the MSM whose owners are also members of the CFR.

Confusing ?

Simply put... G Bush + the MSM + CFR + the remaining candidates = NAU minus Ron Paul.

An additional requirement, that will go into effect in April 2008 is the National ID,

The Government says compliance is not mandatory, however states that block it will not receive any Federal assistance. Air and train travel may also be restricted to and from those states. There are twelve states blocking it now.

During the formation of the European Union (EU) a new flag was adopted at the reluctance of the Countries involved, the flags of those proud countries faded away. Soon with the formation of the North American Union our flag we love so much... our Red White and Blue will fade away as well.

VIEW POINT:

In my personal opinion, Ron Paul is the only person in this country willing or able, to stop this from happening. I know, because he said so. If by some sad chance he does not get the nomination for the Repulican Party, he needs to switch parties. "WE" Ron Paul supporters couldn't care less which Party he represents. All we know for sure is that he absolutly needs to be in the general election. With a change in Party we would have more time to bypass the MSM and get his message out to the world. I have no dobt in my mind that he would get the popular vote by a landslide. Kipper Mathews

Recommended further reading:

[link edited for length]

Did you like this article?
If you did, Thumb It!
8 thumbs so far

2008 Kipper Mathews, all rights reserved.
Published: Sunday, February 3, 2008
Last modified: Tuesday, March 4, 2008

The views expressed in this article are those of Kipper Mathews only and do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. Kipper Mathews is solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.

Report violation by Kipper Mathews of Nolan Chart LLC's terms of use policy.