Is there really any rationale at all to suggest that McCain even qualifies for the Presidency? by A.J. Antimony
(libertarian)
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
There's proof he will not work to defend the Constitution. Does anybody truly know what this guy has been up to in the Senate? According to Mark Levin of nationalreview.com
1. The McCain-Feingold Bill - "the most brazen frontal assault on political speech since Buckley v. Valeo."
3. The McCain-Lieberman Bill - "the most onerous and intrusive attack on American industry through reporting, regulating, and taxing authority of greenhouse gases in American history."
4. The McCain-Kennedy-Edwards Bill - "the biggest boon to the trial bar since the tobacco settlement, under the rubric of a patients' bill of rights."
5. McCain-Reimportation of Drugs - "a significant blow to pharmaceutical research and development, not to mention consumer safety."
6. McCain-ACLU - "the unprecedented granting of due-process rights to unlawful enemy combatants (terrorists)."
So is there anyone out there who can give me one good reason why John McCain is qualified to be President? And I'm talking policies here. So don't bring up his POW story again. That doesn't even answer the question. Don't bring up his personality. That doesn't answer the question either. Just give me one example that supports that John McCain will solemnly swear to faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Did you like this article? If you did, Thumb It! 22
thumbs so far
The views expressed
in this article are those of A.J. Antimony only and
do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates.
A.J. Antimony is solely responsible for the contents
of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated
with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
