"Help what have I done?" The abridgement of free speech
I have often said of our founders, they were geniuses when it came to drafting the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights. They must be saying how dumb some are for not upholding these rights guaranteed to we the people'. by Mary MacElveen
(libertarian)
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
In watching this disturbing feed in which an audience member challenges Senator John Kerry concerning the 2004 presidential outcome, you will clearly see he was not a threat to anyone. So, the question is; why did the police move in and taser this man for asking a question that is most likely in the minds of others?
Â
I noticed that this same feed was picked up by MSNBC and was bantered about by Tucker Carlson and WillyGeist who is a frequent guest of his. Geist opines this manâs question as being âstrangeâ and who is he to judge a question that has been on the minds of many as I read various political lists? Most likely he opined it âstrangeâ because the man cites âSkull and Bonesâ which is a society that both Senator Kerry and President Bush belonged to while attending Yale.Â
Â
CBS did a piece on Skull and Bones back in June of 2004 in which they wrote of it, âBonesmen, as they're called, are forbidden to reveal what goes on in their inner sanctum, the windowless building on the Yale campus that is called the Tomb.â I do not know about you, but I find that strange and not the question asked of Kerryâs and Bushâs membership to it.
Â
This event took place at the University of Florida and I am of the opinion that a university is a place where students are supposed to be learning and that does mean asking questions. They should be free to ask questions of invited guests. Shouldnât they?
Â
Geist states that this man âdisruptedâ the event as he asked that question of Senator Kerry. From what I saw it was the police who disrupted the event. This is disturbing on so many levels where a citizen of this country cannot even ask a question of an elected representative without being ensnared, a taser gun used on them and ultimately arrested.
Â
Senator John Kerry served in the military and the military is used to fight for our freedoms and one of those freedoms is the first amendment to our United States Constitution. Yesterday was Constitution Day and Senator Kerry should have stood in defense when that amendment reads, âCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.â
Â
The man arrested was exercising his right of free speech in asking that question. He was petitioning the government for a redress of grievancesâ since Senator Kerry is an elected representative of the Senate. From what I viewed he was calmly asking the question thereby fulfilling that the people have the âright to peacefully assembleâ
Â
Geist opined that the âstudent became more and more worked upâ Wait, just wait, Mr. Geist. He was not getting worked up, but was calmly asking a question of Kerry. Mr. Geist, he was not being âannoyingâ or âpesteringâ Senator Kerry as you so stated on that program, merely asking a question and even citing Greg Palast.
Â
Now let me opine on this arrest. Instead of standing up on that stage, Senator Kerry should have told those police officers to stand down since he represents this government and he should have upheld our United States Constitution which he is sworn to uphold.
Â
The chilling words that I heard is when this young man who had every right to ask these questions of Senator Kerry was, âHelp!ââŚâWhat have I done?â and âI didnât do anything!â To that young man, you have not done anything and your first amendment rights were violated.
Â
I also think what bothered me is the humorous nature both Carlson and Geist treated this abridgement of free speech. They did so as they enjoy their first amendment rights day-in and day-out. To that I also add, shame on both of them for treating this in such a jovial manner.
Â
I have often said of our founders, they were geniuses when it came to drafting the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights. They must be saying how dumb some are for not upholding these rights guaranteed to âwe the peopleâ.
The views expressed
in this article are those of Mary MacElveen only and
do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates.
Mary MacElveen is solely responsible for the contents
of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated
with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
Posted By: Walt Thiessen
Date: 2007-09-18 12:45:55
After watching the video of the incident I think both the police and the student were at fault. The student was clearly getting agitated and had no intention of relinquishing the microphone under any circumstances. His question was actually three questions with a lot of preface. If I'd been running the event, I'd have felt he was going too far. After all, it was the university that owned the microphone, not the student.
At the same time, the police really had no justification for tasering him. The video was loud and clear enough that it would have been easy to hear the police officers' voices, but they said nothing! The just started to drag him off. That's definitely over-the-line behavior, regardless of what their internal department investigation decides should have happened.
It seems to me that cooler heads should have prevailed, but that wasn't even attempted. I agree that Kerry should have spoken up, but he didn't.
I'm no fan of Kerry, but in other videos of the event (search Youtube) you can hear Kerry once tell the officers to let him answer the question.
I suspect the kid would have dominated the mike for as long as he was allowed, and thus removing him may have been *eventually* neccesary. But he posed no threat to anyone, and might have gone quietly if the police would actually respond to his questions. There was no justification for tazering him.
Want to comment on
this article? Leave your comment
here. Your email address is required to track your
comment. However, we will neither publish your email
address nor distribute it to other organizations or
persons. The only reason we might use it would be if
we needed to contact you regarding your comment. All
comments are subject to our
terms of use policy.