Nolan Chart
Home Be a Columnist Logon Columns Survey FAQ Newsletter Contact Print Ads Banners Links

Truckernomics
columnist: Billy Joe

Like This Article?
Thumb It!
13 thumbs so far

Topic: Ron Paul
tReason Magazine goes to the Dark Side

The guardians of libertarian puritanism throw Ron Paul overboard.
by Billy Joe
(libertarian)
Saturday, January 12, 2008

Update: see bottom for correspondence with Matt Welch

"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act." -George Orwell 

The highest circulation libertarian periodical in America has joined the racist smear dog-pile on Ron Paul, or maybe they started it. It seems pretty damn suspicious Kirchick went out of his way to absolve The "libertines" at Reason and the "urbane libertarians" at Cato from any connection to Dr. No in his original TNR hitpiece. CATO is a beltway think tank. Both Cato and Reason have said from the beginning that Dr. Paul "can't win," so now they have a huge incentive to try to make their predictions come true. Funny also how the newsletters were unearthed from the Univesity of Kansas library, the university where Charles Koch, CATO funder, is a major patron.

They also guarantee themselves facetime on every cable news program in the country where they can spin their cowardly abandonment of the most pro-freedom candidate in decades as independence. They are so pure, that for them any libertarian candidate pragmatic enough to get elected is not idealistic enough to be worthy of office. The are shocked, SHOCKED to discover that the dumb things printed in old Ron Paul newsletters--things they have been aware of for months if not years-- were actually not ALL of the dumb things.

What's different about the new revelations? The context! Candidate Paul is gaining traction, so now his decades-old, well aired editorial lapse of judgement is evidence that he is dangerous, not quaint. But wait, if he can't win, why is he so dangerous?

Letting a bunch of xenophobic rot appear in his old newsletters actually does reveal something about Ron Paul. It reveals that he faults on the side of trusting people too much, rather than not enough. As a publisher, he foolishly trusted his editor to actually edit. Letting this go on for years is evidence that he is too tolerant of people and ideas he does not agree with. He has insufficient support for the thought police that keep this country on the track it is on. He naively believes that exposing people to unpopular ideas is beneficial, not harmful and that people can detect faulty resoning for themselves.

It's a good thing he can't win.

"Wisdom is better than weapons of war, but one sinner destroys much good."

-Ecclesiastes 9:18

RonPaulisWrong.Com

Matt:

Thanks for the correction. I will make the approriate
changes.

I look forward to Reason covering the story of the
NAACP defending Dr. Paul.

-Joe

--- Matt Welch wrote:

> Dear Joe,
>
> Thanks for the e-mail.
>
> We didn't do an about-face on Paul, we aren't based
> in New York, and
> judging by the response to our work so far from
> Paul-supporting
> libertarians, there's a ton of people out there who
> *do* find those
> newsletters newsworthy to some degree.
>
> Best,
> Matt
>
> William Allen wrote:
> > This total about face on Ron Paul doesn't seem
> > reasonable. What candidate can live up to your
> > standards? Why are you alienating so many of your
> > readers?? What other candidate could you possibly
> say
> > supports "free minds and free markets"?
> >
> > I am starting to think that Adolf Ghouliani got to
> you
> > guys somehow. You guys are in New York, right?
> >
> > BTW, How the hell did Julie get the endorsement
> from
> > Pat Robertson?? A thrice married gun grabbing big
> > government pro-choice New Yorker! I am not a
> paranoid
> > Truther, but something smells sinister here.
> >
> > These old newsletters are not going to get
> traction
> > because it's not newsworthy, timely or relavent
> and
> > you are discrediting yourselves as a legitimate
> > libertarian news organization.
> >
> > I trust Dr. Paul when he says he is not a racist-
> more
> > than I trust you when you claim to be libertarian.
> >
> > -Joe Allen

Did you like this article?
If you did, Thumb It!
13 thumbs so far

©2008 Billy Joe, all rights reserved. You must have written permission from the author in order to republish this work.
Published: Saturday, January 12, 2008
Last modified: Thursday, January 17, 2008

The views expressed in this article are those of Billy Joe only and do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. Billy Joe is solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.

Report violation by Billy Joe of Nolan Chart LLC's terms of use policy.


More Articles By Billy Joe

Be A Columnist
Tell A Friend About This Article
Leave A Comment

Reader Comments:

Posted By: Christopher Espinal
Date: 2008-01-12 17:52:33

Good move by Reason Magazine. They are rational and understand politics! Too bad obsessive Paul supporters will never take a notorious Libertarian magazine with real things to say about politics seriously.

Report violation


Posted By: Dagny
Date: 2008-01-12 18:11:29

The fact that Reason has joined the side of the politically-correct, anti-libertarian, groupthink folks tells me more about what Reason has become and less about Rep. Paul.

 Harry Browne, rest his soul, never got the message across, never ignited a revolution of thought, that could compare to what is happening today through Dr, Paul.  

 Shame on Reason for crumbling at the first blow.

Report violation


Posted By: DenisL
Date: 2008-01-12 19:22:17

Paul lent his name to a small newsletter for a short time that he did not edit, while he was out of politics and concentrating on delivering babies. I look at it as running an unmoderated blog in the days before the internet. The writing style was not Ron Paul's. In his newsletters since being back in Congress, he is clearly in charge and they are wonderful to read. Clearly Paul is the most vehement anti-racist, anti-sexist, pro-individual, & pro-gay rights person in Congress. He ran as a Libertarian Presidential candidate for gosh sakes. The New Republic did not even contact Ron Paul to talk to him about their story & they did not seem to know that it had been discussed several times over the years & dismissed as not reflecting Ron Paul's beliefs. The New Republic, if you will remember, compared Ross Perot to Hitler! Ron Paul is a good man being smeared for political reasons. Check out this website for the CNN interview with Ron Paul about this where all is explained:Hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2008/01/hotline_after_d_323.html

Report violation


Posted By: Chilli
Date: 2008-01-12 20:35:33

The last I heard, Reason was based in Los Angeles. Has this changed?

Report violation


Posted By: Joe Allen
Date: 2008-01-13 03:19:53

Yes. I believe they just moved. You might want to double check that.

 

Report violation


Posted By: JosephR
Date: 2008-01-13 22:24:02

I guess reason doesn't care much for the head of the NAACP coming out in favor of Ron Paul and describing a 20 year relationship as well as being the only candidate that would abolish the racist drug war.

Report violation


Posted By: Gene
Date: 2008-01-14 13:43:03

I'd toss Reason into the CATO Institute lot.  Easily controlled by board members.  Remeber, Rupert Murdoch is a CATO board member.  Ideal for keeping Libertarianism a 2% club that includeds a deadly platform of weak immigration standards and open borders.  

Report violation


Want to comment on this article? Leave your comment here. Your email address is required to track your comment. However, we will neither publish your email address nor distribute it to other organizations or persons. The only reason we might use it would be if we needed to contact you regarding your comment. All comments are subject to our terms of use policy.

Leave A Comment

Your Name:  

Your Email Address*:  

Your Comment: