While the presidential campaigns of John McCain and Barack Obama have stepped gingerly around the financial crisis and the question of government intervention, third party candidates Bob Barr and Ralph Nader ... have embraced the market meltdown, viewing it as a rare opportunity to highlight bold economic positions and, perhaps as important, claim credit for sounding the early warning alarms. "We've been hammering it," said Shane Cory, Barr's deputy campaign manager. "When this first came about with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Bob was explaining, 'When we bail out Fannie and Freddie, expect more to come.'" -- Ben Adler, "Nader, Barr & Paul: 'Told you so'," Politico, Sep. 21, 2008. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13699.html
The campaign has been highlighting this issue for months, both on talk shows, in press releases and at campaign stops. We cannot continue to make mistakes of the past and keep intervening in the economy. The free market must be allowed to work. -- Jason Pye, "Barr ahead of the curve on financial crisis," Barr Blog, Sep. 21, 2008. http://blog.bobbarr2008.com/2008/09/21/barr-ahead-of-the-curve-on-financial-crisis/
The latest financial crisis involving Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which guarantee home mortgages, demonstrates yet again how government intervention in private markets almost always comes to grief.[...]
These problems are almost entirely the fault of the federal government. Congress created programs to artificially inflate the housing market, established Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to be exempt from normal scrutiny, oversight, and competition, and expanded their activities in response to the sub-prime lending meltdown. Government must get out of the mortgage business, but must do so in a way that least harms taxpayers and the economy.
In the short-term, government has little choice but to provide an explicit but limited loan guarantee, thereby capping the public's liability, now widely assumed to be without limit. At the same time, Congress must restrict the number and size of loans by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and set more substantial capital requirements, while authorizing greater Federal Reserve oversight of their operations. The organizations must begin downsizing their portfolios, reducing their risks, and reestablishing their financial credibility.
However, the ultimate objective must be full privatization with both organizations turned into private companies, responsible for their loan portfolios, and without access to government guarantees or other forms of support. Government should not be in the business of creating multi-billion dollar enterprises to manipulate markets for the benefit of one group or anotherin this case, in order to shave the interest rates for selected home buyers by a quarter or half percent.
Finally, we must learn the lesson that government subsidy programs almost always end up running out of control, causing financial disaster for taxpayers.
http://www.bobbarr2008.com/press/press-releases/56/bob-barr-says-privatize-fannie-mae-and-
freddie-mac-end-government-subsidies/
"Americans thought they slew the dragon of inflation years ago, but it seems to be back, with the biggest monthly increase in the consumer price index in 26 years," observes Bob Barr, the Libertarian Party candidate for president.[...] "Unfortunately, the government bears much of the blame, since the Federal Reserve's continued cuts in interest rates and increases in the money supply have naturally inflated the general price level," says Barr. "In its desperate attempt to bail out the housing industry and spur business investment, the Federal Reserve appears to have infected the entire economy with the inflation virus."
"Federal Reserve policy has reached a dead end, since the Fed can ill afford to continue pressing interest rates lower, further stoking the fires of inflation and undercutting the value of the dollar. Yet the housing market remains depressed and the long-feared recession may finally arrive on our economic doorstep," notes Barr.
"There is no painless way to avoid market adjustments to past mistakes. But we should learn the obvious lesson that there is no free lunch: government cannot magically grow the economy and create jobs. Instead, manipulating the interest rate and money supply has resulted in significant costs for all Americans," explains Barr. "Turning the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve into bail-out agencies of last resort for everyone from Bear Stearns on Wall Street to the housing industry, along with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, compounds the problem.
"It is very important to maintain price stability," Mr. Bernanke told congress recently. "So it is," says Barr. "But the only way to do that is to end the governments attempt to micro-manage the economy, while protecting companies and industries from the consequences of their mistakes. If we dont change current policy - really change it - resurgent inflation will be just one of many economic charges that we will all have to pay."
http://www.bobbarr2008.com/press-releases/61/to-fight-inflation-curb-economic-micro-
management-and-bail-outs-by-government-says-bob-barr/
"It appears that President George W. Bush should say that we are all socialists now," says Barr, as he explains that the government has now taken over insurance giant AIG with an $85 billion loan, for which it received an 80 percent equity stake in the company. "In other words, the federal government now will own and run one of the nation's largest insurance companies."
"This administration, supposedly devoted to free markets and fiscal responsibility, has bailed out the housing industry, the quasi-government mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the investment house Bear Stearns, and a leading insurer. What's next?" asks Barr.
"And how will we pay for this ever-rising bill for corporate welfare? The national debt already runs $9.5 trillion," Barr explains. "The deficit this year will run a record $407 billion. Next year the red ink will be even greater. And there are trillions upon trillions of dollars that will come due under Medicare and Social Security as the Baby-Boomers retire," he adds.
"Moreover, the latest bailouts are being made in secret by the Federal Reserve. At least the housing and Fannie/Freddie bailouts came with congressional authority, if not understanding," notes Barr. "However, no one voted to pour taxpayer funds into Wall Street. And no one voted for the government to take over an insurance company. If the Federal Reserve can spend as much money as it desires to bail out any company that it desires, is there anything that it cannot do with taxpayer funds?"
http://www.bobbarr2008.com/press-releases/135/another-federal-bailout%c2%a0-i-told-you-so-says-bob-barr/
-
ALG (Americans for Limited Government) News Network, YouTube, Sep. 17, 2008. http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=_55NI5D9EQo
-
http://www.nolanchart.com/article5124.html
http://www.nolanchart.com/article5148.html
©2008 George Dance, all rights reserved. You must have written permission from the author in order to republish this work.
Published: Sunday, September 21, 2008
Last modified: Friday, October 17, 2008
The views expressed in this article are those of George Dance only and do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. George Dance is solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
Report violation by George Dance of Nolan Chart LLC's terms of use policy.
| More Articles By George Dance |
Reader Comments:
Posted By: Brian S
Date: 2008-09-21 14:47:14
Awesome article. That pretty much sums up a great portion of this election, not to mention why McCain and Obama are afraid to have Bob participate in the debates. If someone approached them about REAL issues, I think that McCain would have an aneurism and Obama would get that 'deer in the headlight' look in his face because he cant come up with some witty comeback.
We need every American to get involved wiht this election. I can say that because I have sat out the last few because I was ignoring the signs that this country is headed down a one-way road to Socialism. I didnt trust politicians and let that cloud my judgement about getting involved. When I heard Bob Barr the first time, I actually started paying attention to what was happening around me. I might not be the most knowledeable about politics, but I DO know when 2 of the (supposedly) best candidates cant focus on issues and keep talking about pigs/lipstick, who is the celebrity candidate, lie about condidtions in Iraq on national TV then say they were trying to make a point(McCain), say that they have a plan for the financial stability of this country but choose not to release it yet(Obama)... that something needs to be done and it needs to be done fast!!!
Thank you...
Posted By: Walt Thiessen
Date: 2008-09-21 19:06:40
It's nice to hear Barr saying something that actually makes real sense for a change. Too bad there's really no way to square his very accurate criticisms of bailouts with his support for the invasion of Iraq, the Patriot Act, etc., all of which are designed to help promote the militaristic side of Fed expansion of the money supply.
In other words, Barr has no problem supporting military-based programs (only in limited forms, of course!) that are financed by the banking cartel. He just doesn't want the government to bail out that same banking cartel when things go sour. That makes him a very weak president if he somehow miraculously gets elected. It makes him vulnerable to banking cartel blackmail whenever the spam hits the fan with military-based investments.
Posted By: Marguerite Lorenz
Date: 2008-09-22 09:15:38
I agree with Walt Thiessen's take on Bob Barr's campaign. I feel that every Libertarian/libertarian should write in the name of Ron Paul on our presidential ballots.
Readers, vote for "principle above party". Ron Paul has demonstrated his leadership and his ethics repeatedly. I am asking Libertarians to do the same thing I am asking all Americans to do (including Democrats and Republicans); though the system is flawed, we have a man who has expressed his willingness and ability to serve - Write-in RON PAUL and really make a change!
Marguerite Lorenz
Fiduciary@MyTrustee.net
Posted By: Natalie Schultz
Date: 2008-09-22 13:31:51
Is the part about online credit-card transactions going to the government (IRS) true?
That cannot be the case; I know dems will do anything, but that is way beyond unconstitutional. I need a link to this. No way any Republican would stand for that; ignoring the constitutional part, it would destroy the economy if the IRS can stop online transactions.
I'm not in the mood to get into my own theories on why we've become a credit card society (this sort of bill proves me right), but I still cannot fathom that this would pass congress.
I'm totally against the bailouts too. Peter Schiff was on CNN the other day arguing against the bailouts, and although Ali Belshi and John Fund were arguing that the bailouts are "necessary" to stop the economy from crashing, they did agree with Schiff about the pitfalls. I think Schiff actually managed to convince and scare the shit out of Anderson Cooper.
Posted By: Walt Thiessen
Date: 2008-09-22 17:07:53
Hey George, did you see where Paul dissed Barr and endorsed Baldwin? At the Campaign for Liberty website he wrote, "I’ve thought about the unsolicited advice from the Libertarian Party candidate, and he has convinced me to reject my neutral stance in the November election. I’m supporting Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate."
So much for Barr's strong-arm attempts to gain Paul's support. I'll be interested to see your take on this in your next article. In the meantime, I think we can safely say that the Barr campaign is over.
I personally can't support Baldwin either, but I can't deny that this is a case of what goes around, comes around, where Barr is concerned.
Posted By: George Dance
Date: 2008-09-22 18:26:35
Is the part about online credit-card transactions going to the government (IRS) true?... I need a link to this.
Here's a link to the bill (H.R.3221):
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-3221
I'm not going to check all 600+ pages myself, but anyone who wants is welcome.
Here's some guy who says it's in there:
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=Wy6SlUpbnIU
Posted By: George Dance
Date: 2008-09-22 18:42:02
we have a man who has expressed his willingness and ability to serve
I don't see much willingness. He's repeatedly turned down presidential nominations from more than one party. Though he ran for the GOP nomination, he wasn't nominated at the convention; nor did he vote for himself; nor did most of the delegates pledged to him.