There is much news today about the housing mess as well as soaring health care and education, fuel and food costs. With very few exceptions, most politicians have plans to fix all this with greater government oversight and funding. But wait a minute. Isn't government oversight and funding why these issues are out of control in the first place? Won't more of the same certainly make it worse?
Housing - We all know what's happening in the housing and financial markets but do we know why?
The taxpayer is on the verge of taking over something like $5 trillion in debt from Freddie and Fannie. Never mind the $300 billion created out of thin air for the foreclosure prevention act. Never mind the rescue of failed institutions like IndyMac, Bear Stearns and others. Most homeowners if they still have a house, have little, no, or negative equity in their largest and most emotional investment...their home! Have we learned our lesson yet?
Health Care - Our health care expenditures currently represent about 17% of our GDP (around $2 trillion, or about $7,026 per person), and are on track to consume 20% of our GDP in 2017, doubling to around $4 trillion. Prior to 1960, health care consumed less than 5% of our personal expenditures while food consumed more than 20%. Now food has been halved to about 10% while health care has quadrupled to our largest single personal expenditure coming in at around 20%! Certainly health care has benefitted from technological advances, just like every other sector, including food, but technology should drive the cost down, not up. That's what technology does. Take as an example, calculators. When I started college in the mid 70's, a simple electronic calculator cost more than a well equipped personal computer costs today. So why are health care costs so out of control?
And all for what? Are we healthier? Absolutely not. Are we living longer? Yes, but at what cost and quality of life? Let's see, if electronic calculators had gone the way of health care? Hmm. I wonder.
Education - In 1977 the average cost of college tuition was $924. By 2006, it was up to $7,601, rising at twice the rate of inflation. Graduates are entering the workplace with debts that they may never be able to repay, never mind purchase a house or pay for health care. Why?
By creating money out of thin air (grants, loans, and tax-incentivized savings plans) the cost of higher education has been driven to an unfortunate end where many graduates are entering the workplace in mediocre professions with mediocre skills and a debt that they may never be able to repay.
Y'know, miracle of miracles, I believe I see a pattern developing! Three huge sectors of our society thoroughly corrupted and adulterated by similar government policies. Can we stop this insanity?
Food and fuel is a little different story.
Fuel - Oil has doubled in price in the last year. Yeah, yeah, yeah, we can blame big oil and George Bush, but the real culprits are:
Food - Agriculture is very energy intensive so a doubling in the cost of energy will certainly pressure food prices (and everything else for that matter) to rise accordingly. Furthermore, our weakened currency makes what few exports we still have (like food and fertilizer) to be in higher demand overseas placing even more upward pressure on food costs. Many blame ethanol for increased food costs, but I'm afraid it is just not so...at least not now.
Food and fuel have not yet been as corrupted as housing, education and health care, but this year's political wannabes plan to fix all of these problems with more of the very policies that created them in the first place! Insane! Most if not all of our problems can be laid squarely at the feet of government policy.
Many wish to tax the "rich" to pay for more failed policy and give the working man a break. Here's an interesting thought. If we take from the "rich" and give to the "poor" won't the funds be spent such that the "rich" become richer?
Angier is self employed in agri-business. He can be contacted at chuckangier@gmail.com.
©2008 Chuck Angier, all rights reserved. You must have written permission from the author in order to republish this work.
Published: Sunday, August 24, 2008
Last modified: Sunday, August 24, 2008
The views expressed in this article are those of Chuck Angier only and do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. Chuck Angier is solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
Report violation by Chuck Angier of Nolan Chart LLC's terms of use policy.
| More Articles By Chuck Angier |
Reader Comments:
Posted By: trd
Date: 2008-08-24 18:46:05
Chuck:
This is one of the best articles that I have read. Straight to the point and easy to understand.
Posted By: David S
Date: 2008-08-24 19:52:32
Most readers of this forum are probably familiar with the following quote attributed to Sir Alexander Tytler:
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury. From that time on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the results that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship."
In my opinion Tytler was exactly right. Yeah I know you're going to say; but we don't have a democracy. Our founders created a constitutional republic. That's true, but our constitutional republic is dependent on representatives who will uphold their oath to support the constitution. Unfortunately, most of our representatives don't give a rat's ass about the constitution. They will do whatever it takes to get elected. Consequently we have unconstitutional government involvement in housing, education and health care, not to mention two concurrent wars without a declaration of war. So yes the founders created a constitutional republic but today it functions like a democracy. I suspect it will suffer the fate Tytler described and there is nothing we can do to stop it. Maybe Tytler's comment should be thought of as a law of nature.
Posted By: trd
Date: 2008-08-25 07:26:39
Although not as extreme as with housing, education and health care, food and oil do have some insanity government intrusing as well:
Food: Farmers subsidies; welfaire food coupons; WIC; FDA
Oil: some tax credits or incentives to recoup drilling costs.
Posted By: Chris Wagner
Date: 2008-08-26 08:27:01
"but the most obvious is the mortgage interest deduction, a huge incentive to borrow money to buy a house. "
I believe that the above statement is a myth. With all the software programs to assist in doing taxes, take the time to removed the deduction and see what the difference is? When I did it years go I had sent almost $10,000 to the bank in interest. If I had spent that money on computers or software and had rented a place to live and by removing that 'interest line' from the tax form, the difference was $780. So sending the bank $10,000 so I can get back $780 doesn't sound like a huge incentive to me.