Topic: New World Order
Farah's Inconsistencies. WorldNetDaily's Editor Speaks with Forked Tongue
An analsis of WorldNetDaily's Editor Joseph Farah article on Lew Rockwell.
by Servando Gonzalez
(libertarian)
Saturday, April 19, 2008

One of the latest pieces by Joseph Farah, Editor of WorldNetDaily, is a hateful diatribe against Lew Rockwell, Editor of LewRockwell.com. According to Farah, Rockwell is an anti-American of the worst type, who tells "vitriolic lies about America."

What are, according to Farah, Rockwell's anti-American vitriolic lies? Let's see what Rockwell wrote:

"Once again, Ron is the only man in the House of Unrepresentatives not to take the pro-war, CIA line. He refuses to do what is constitutionally none of the U.S. government's business: intervene in China. He is also keenly aware of the irony of a murderous empire that has killed 1 million civilians in Iraq alone, in order to maintain its subjugation, criticizing anyone else."

(I took the Rockwell quote directly from Farah's article,"Off the deep end.")

Well, either my English is more deficient than I think or I am missing something here. Let me read again " a murderous empire that has killed 1 million civilians in Iraq alone, in order to maintain its subjugation, criticizing anyone else." Apparently Farah's subconscious mind is playing tricks on him, because, as you see, there is no mention of the United States of America in that text.

Of course, Rockwell is referring to an empire that, just by chance, until now has been based on the USA, but soon it will be based on the North American Union and, eventually, on the American Union as a previous step to include the whole world in what the conspirators who control it euphemistically call the New World Order. If Farah does not know what the North American Union, the American Union, or the New World Order are, I suggest him to read WorldNetDaily, particularly the Letters to the Editor section.

Actually, the criminal empire Rockwell refers to is the one controlled by an elite of Wall Street bankers, oil magnates, and transnational corporations that, using Fabian (or Gramscian) techniques of infiltration has managed to get full control over the U.S. Government and is using it to advance their own, secret comuno-fascist totalitarian agenda. Unfortunately, most of the world hates us, the American citizens, for the atrocities these small elite has committed and is currently perpetrating.

This Wall Street mafia of bankers and their secret agents infiltrated in the U.S. Government, not Lew Rockwell, are the true haters of America. They are the ones telling vitriolic lies about America. They are the ones who plan to destroy America. They are America's worst enemy.

In a 2003 article, "The pending demise of WorldNetDaily?," Tom Ambrose, commentary editor of WND, criticizes the critics by arguing that the site is an independent news site publishing viewpoints from all over the political spectrum. I have no objection to this. Disagreement is part of the democratic, civilized way of living. Contradictory points of view among different individuals is a strong evidence of freedom and a very healthy feature of a democratic republic.

What is not acceptable, however, is contradictory points of view expressed by the same individual. This is precisely why most people don't like politicians like the three ones now running for the presidency of this country. And most people don't like them because inconsistency is the mark of the opportunist and the liar. Unfortunately, inconsistency is precisely what has characterized Mr. Farah's thinking of lately.

For example, like many WorldNetDaily readers familiar with Farah's articles, I expected he was going to support Ron Paul, because most of Paul's political position agreed with most of Farah's expressed position. But, surprisingly, Farah did an unexplainable about face and wrote "Earmark this, Ron Paul!," a vitriolic, hateful article against Ron Paul. In my eyes, with that article Farah lost all credibility. More intriguing, he published it after the media, particularly the Republican "conservative" media, had started a take-no-prisoners war against Paul. After reading this article I dropped Farah in the same trash can I put Pat Robertson after expressing his support for Rudi Giuliani and Richard Mellon Scaife after showing his sympathy for Hillary Clinton.

In another article, "Why Ron Paul is disqualified," Farah claimed that he did not support Ron Paul because "Paul essentially calls for running up the white flag of surrender to an enemy that seeks America's destruction." Apparently Farah is a believer in conspiracy theories -- particularly the ones advanced by the Bush administration --, because actually Paul was calling for a fight against the worst enemies of America: the Wall Street bankers and their secret agents of the Council on Foreign Relations. Ron Paul intended to bring the U.S. Army back to America, where it belongs, to help us defend ourselves from all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Farah claims that Lew Rockwell hates America, which implies that he, Farah, the super patriot, loves America. The problem with that view is that, now more than ever, it has become evident that there are two Americas. Like many Americans, I hate the murderous empire that, under the control of the Wall Street bankers, is hiding behind the facade of the United States of America. These bankers, not Lew Rockwell or Ron Paul, are the ones conspiring in the shadows to destroy America.

For obvious reasons, I cannot call current America under the Bush regime, like Farah does, the greatest experiment in freedom the world has ever known. The country that was a beacon of liberty and freedom is rapidly becoming a totalitarian comuno-fascist dictatorship. Having lived under a democracy, a dictatorship, and a totalitarian dictatorship (in that order), I have a first hand experience, and I know very well the differences. And, frankly, this America Farah loves so much scares the hell out of me.

©2008 Servando Gonzalez, all rights reserved. You must have written permission from the author in order to republish this work.
Published: Saturday, April 19, 2008
Last modified: Saturday, June 28, 2008

The views expressed in this article are those of Servando Gonzalez only and do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. Servando Gonzalez is solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.

Report violation by Servando Gonzalez of Nolan Chart LLC's terms of use policy.

More Articles By Servando Gonzalez

Reader Comments:

Posted By: Lamar Carnes
Date: 2008-04-21 16:25:56

The oil rich tyrants who control the Islamic nations and have placed all of them under their intolerant religious laws and are kept in power by the world's money, especially the U.S.A.'s, needs to be brought down by all nations working in conjunction on the issue! It is time that every Nation on earth is not controlled by religious nuts or groups! People should have a Government free from religious matters and one that upholds the right for all religions to exist except those who commit crimes against the people! If religions were wise enough to make sure that their purpose of being was to worship a God and serve Him instead of getting involved in politics and running the affairs of a Government the world would be at peace for the most part! Governments must begin to learn something from past history and past history for centuries and milleniums has shown that religion has created and caused most of the worlds ills because of its desire to be involved in Government! This should be an easy thing to see if one can read history! I am for mankind seeking for God and living for Him but never getting into the governmental affairs of any nation or people! Islam has to change! But also all the others must do so also, one's such as Hinduism, Buddhests, Jews and Christians! Equal footing should all religions have before any and all governments! Neither should the governments make it difficult on any religious movement either! Each religious movement should obey the laws of the land they are in and learn to live at peace with one another also! Most religious movements can go along very well with normal orderly laws that all people should live by such as but not limited to; murder, robbery, fraud, physical harm, persecution, rape, nudity, child abuse, slavery, multiple spouses since this brings harm to children and even to a stable family style in communities, etc.! The U.S. and the U.N. and the European Union should work to get the abberant religious movements to fall in line, those such as, Islamic, Hindu, Buddhests and a few places where Roman Catholicism exists!!

Report violation

Posted By: V Leash
Date: 2008-04-21 23:41:25

I had a similar experience with Farah.  When I wrote questioning his denounciations of Ron Paul, he fired back response about how Paul advocated for abolition of the Border Patrol.  I responded with surprise, and speculated that Paul had recommended some other approach, such as use of the military on the border.  Farah ignored this.  It wasn't until much later that I discovered on WND itself an article that noted Paul's early suggestion that we use the military on the border, instead of yet another agency.  I think his original idea is superior to the Border Patrol, which appears to have become a political football.  Farah KNEW Paul had an alternate recommendation, and WITHHELD that knowledge while denigrating Pault to me.  It has left me feeling he is not an honest reporter, but someone promoting news as he sees it.  Outside of Farah, I have much appreciated the news WND reports that is often overlooked or ignored by the mainstream media.  I hope Farah changes his ways.  We always get known for who we are.  If he values the causes he purports to support, he'll become more honest in his reporting.

Report violation

Posted By: M. Teri
Date: 2008-09-03 09:15:19

Sometimes, what people hear about religious groups is lies and distortions.  In China, the Chinese Communist regime suppresses, tortures and imprisons true people of faith - who are among the most socially-responsible people in China today.  The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) lies extensively about these spiritual practices.  For instance, British intelligence reported that it was PLA soldiers dressed as Buddhist monks who were actually responsible for the latest pre-Olympic disturbances in Tibet.  And, Falun Gong, a spiritual practice rooted in ancient Chinese traditions, was outlawed in 1999 by former CCP leader Jiang Zemin due to its enormous popularity.  When it was introduced to the public in 1992, it quickly became  the most popular form of qigong practice in China, and it also enjoyed the support of the CCP regime.  But Jiang launched a national effort to eradicate the spiritual practice when he saw how popular it was.  By doing so, he was also able to consolidate his political power by forcing more moderate Party officials to support his position - a common move amongst communist leaders.  He also let it be known that Falun Gong was a "cult" (not true) and that it is used as an instrument by western "anti-China" forces.  (More lies)  Disinformation abounds regarding this persecution and the Falun Gong spiritual practice, while many of the well-known western media outlets support the CCP propaganda by NOT reporting on the persecution at all (excepting independent media like Nolan - see articles by John Kusumi - thanks Nolan chart!).  For more information on the Falun Gong practice and the CCP's persecution, please see the Falun Dafa Information Center's website (www.faluninfo.net), which is the official voice of Falun Gong.  In this age of disinformation, it's sometimes hard to distinguish the truth from fiction.

Since the 2004 publication of the "Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party" (on the true history of the CCP) by the Epoch Times (see ninecommentaries.com), over 41 million Chinese people have resigned their Party affiliations.  The CCP is falling, from within. 

Report violation