Both Ron Paul and Michael Kinsley say majority rule is bad. Readers of
Any conflicting evidence or is my case proven? know that the Washington Post has been suppressing debate of majority rule since Jan 12. Here is the message I sent Michael Abramowitz on Sunday:
On Jan 12 the Washington Post published 'The Church and Doctrines of Pope Ron Paul' by Michael Kinsley. I was surprised to notice that Kinsley and Paul both reject majority rule.
By comment and letter to the editor I called on the Washington Post to widen debate on majority rule. That was 10 days ago and nothing so far.
My question for Michael Abramowitz:
Will the Washington Post widen debate on majority rule? If so when?
I admit that if he answers the question with a simple No" he will have [ever so slightly] widened debate because he will be doing so with a live 'audience'. If you read this in time, please join Michael to see if he will risk having informed people who may ask: Why? Why not widen debate on majority rule? We may get lucky!
Michael will be at Post Politics Hour from 11am until Noon Washington time. If you can be there for the showdown and he fails to mention my question by say 11:45, pop the question live: Will the Washington Post widen debate on majority rule? If so when? Please be there.©2008 Multimediamonitor, all rights reserved. You must have written permission from the author in order to republish this work.
Published: Sunday, January 20, 2008
Last modified: Monday, January 21, 2008
The views expressed in this article are those of Multimediamonitor only and do not represent the views of Nolan Chart, LLC or its affiliates. Multimediamonitor is solely responsible for the contents of this article and is not an employee or otherwise affiliated with Nolan Chart, LLC in his/her role as a columnist.
Report violation by Multimediamonitor of Nolan Chart LLC's terms of use policy.
| More Articles By Multimediamonitor |
Reader Comments: